On 2012-08-21 21:36, Bjarne D Mathiesen wrote:
> Both seem to come with : java, javac, jar
Hm, it would be interesting to compare the two packages. I went straight
for the SDK as I thought I would need it for compiling stuff.
If the JRE contains javac already, maybe the JDK only contains more
cla
Blair Zajac wrote:
> On 08/21/2012 11:49 AM, Bjarne D Mathiesen wrote:
>> When reading
>> http://www.h-online.com/open/news/item/Java-SE-7-Update-6-hands-OS-X-support-to-Oracle-1667714.html
>>
>> it seems as if the one has to manually upgrade to this version while
>&
On Tue, Aug 21, 2012 at 2:49 PM, Bjarne D Mathiesen <
macint...@mathiesen.info> wrote:
> When reading
>
> http://www.h-online.com/open/news/item/Java-SE-7-Update-6-hands-OS-X-support-to-Oracle-1667714.html
> it seems as if the one has to manually upgrade to this version while
On Tue, Aug 21, 2012 at 3:49 PM, Bjarne D Mathiesen
wrote:
> When reading
> http://www.h-online.com/open/news/item/Java-SE-7-Update-6-hands-OS-X-support-to-Oracle-1667714.html
> it seems as if the one has to manually upgrade to this version while
> future upgrades are then done auto
Jamie Paul Griffin wrote:
> [ Bjarne D Mathiesen wrote on Tue 21.Aug'12 at 20:49:11 +0200 ]
>
>> When reading
>> http://www.h-online.com/open/news/item/Java-SE-7-Update-6-hands-OS-X-support-to-Oracle-1667714.html
>> it seems as if the one has to manually upgrade to
[ Bjarne D Mathiesen wrote on Tue 21.Aug'12 at 20:49:11 +0200 ]
> When reading
> http://www.h-online.com/open/news/item/Java-SE-7-Update-6-hands-OS-X-support-to-Oracle-1667714.html
> it seems as if the one has to manually upgrade to this version while
> future upgrades are then d
When reading
http://www.h-online.com/open/news/item/Java-SE-7-Update-6-hands-OS-X-support-to-Oracle-1667714.html
it seems as if the one has to manually upgrade to this version while
future upgrades are then done automagically by Oracle.
Now, there are 2 (two) versions : JRE & JDK.
Which ver
