Hi René,
On 12/02/2015, at 9:42 AM, René J.V. Bertin wrote:
> On Thursday February 12 2015 09:20:03 Ian Wadham wrote:
>>
>> On 12/02/2015, at 4:39 AM, Jeremy Whiting wrote:
>>> My XCode version on OSX Lion here is 4.6.3 in case that makes any
>>> difference btw.
>>
>> Hmmm. I have Xcode 4.6.1
On Thursday February 12 2015 09:20:03 Ian Wadham wrote:
>
> On 12/02/2015, at 4:39 AM, Jeremy Whiting wrote:
> > My XCode version on OSX Lion here is 4.6.3 in case that makes any
> > difference btw.
>
> Hmmm. I have Xcode 4.6.1 (4H512). But AppleMenu->Software Update… shows that
> only iTunes
On 12/02/2015, at 4:39 AM, Jeremy Whiting wrote:
> My XCode version on OSX Lion here is 4.6.3 in case that makes any difference
> btw.
Hmmm. I have Xcode 4.6.1 (4H512). But AppleMenu->Software Update… shows that
only iTunes is available for update (to v 12.1). My O/S is 10.7.5 (Lion).
What
On Wednesday February 11 2015 10:39:15 Jeremy Whiting wrote:
> My XCode version on OSX Lion here is 4.6.3 in case that makes any
> difference btw.
For a glitch in a headerfile that refers to the compiler version? Yeah, could
well be!
>
> Yeah, definitely. Must be something that broke after I la
On Wednesday February 11 2015 12:12:08 Brandon Allbery wrote:
> > Aha. I take that to mean you can now suppress individual implicitly
> > created constructors ... The syntax is a bit peculiar, but then I've kinda
> > come
> to expect that from C++
> >
...
>
> Also I find your faith in the sa
On Wed, Feb 11, 2015 at 12:07 PM, Brandon Allbery
wrote:
> On Wed, Feb 11, 2015 at 9:56 AM, René J.V. wrote:
>
>> I don't see the point in assigning the delete operator to a constructor
>> nor how that could be valid C++?
>
>
> Aha. I take that to mean you can now suppress individual implicitly
On Wed, Feb 11, 2015 at 9:56 AM, René J.V. wrote:
> I don't see the point in assigning the delete operator to a constructor
> nor how that could be valid C++?
Aha. I take that to mean you can now suppress individual implicitly created
constructors, instead of the older all-or-nothing behavior.
On Wed, Feb 11, 2015 at 5:59 AM, René J.V. wrote:
> The build halts with an error that neither he nor I can make sense of -
> how can a ctor be deleted?
As I understand it, there are some implicit default constructors that are
normally present --- but if you declare certain (any?) constructors
> Yes, I have a macbook running 10.7 currently. I used the system clang to
> build Qt 5.4, though I didn't download and apply all the patches you have
What Xcode version do you use?
> in your macports trac ticket. I only cloned Qt5 5.4 branch, added the QSP
> patch and built it fine here. I built
Hi René,
On 11/02/2015, at 9:59 PM, René J.V. Bertin wrote:
> Ian has been trying to build my qt5-mac-devel port for Qt 5.4.0. If I
> understand correctly he runs 10.7 and seems to be using the system clang
> compiler.
>
> The build halts with an error that neither he nor I can make sense of -
Hello all,
Ian has been trying to build my qt5-mac-devel port for Qt 5.4.0. If I
understand correctly he runs 10.7 and seems to be using the system clang
compiler.
The build halts with an error that neither he nor I can make sense of - how can
a ctor be deleted?
{{{
/Applications/Xcode.app/Co
11 matches
Mail list logo
