Anders F Björklund wrote:
> > Objective-C++ eventually got included, so Objective-C 2.0 probably will.
> > Someone needs to write a new runtime, though, such as the GNUstep one ?
I think everything will be in Apple's public CVS - but in this mail,
Apple point to deeper dependencies on Leopard.:
On 10/30/07, Anders F Björklund wrote:
> Xcode 2.5 will soon be available, as the end-of-the-road for Tiger...
> But it probably doesn't have all the features and fixes of Xcode 3.0.
Good news.
> > Only the command line GNU tools in Xcode are open source, such as gcc
> > itself.
>
> Not all too
David Corking wrote:
I posted a bug report about Xcode Find (in a file versus in a
project) and
the developers said it should be fixed in Xcode 3.0.
I think you will find the IDE portion of Xcode is closed source. If
the bug is in the IDE, and
Apple don't backport it themselves, you are out
On 10/29/07, Instruct ICC wrote:
> I posted a bug report about Xcode Find (in a file versus in a project) and
> the developers said it should be fixed in Xcode 3.0.
I think you will find the IDE portion of Xcode is closed source. If
the bug is in the IDE, and
Apple don't backport it themselves,
On Oct 29, 2007, at 16:55, Instruct ICC wrote:
> > I'm sure the MacPorts project would not be interested in
supporting a
> > tweaked version of Xcode.
Why not?
We have enough trouble keeping this working with the current set of
Apple-supported tools. I for one have zero interested in try
> > I'm sure the MacPorts project would not be interested in supporting a
> > tweaked version of Xcode.
Why not?
I'm thinking tweaked for Tiger, but maybe someone else will say tweaked for OS
9.
> Quite. MacPorts already has 8 versions of gcc - there is no room for
> any more. I have no perso
On 10/29/07, Ryan Schmidt <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> I'm sure the MacPorts project would not be interested in supporting a
> tweaked version of Xcode.
Quite. MacPorts already has 8 versions of gcc - there is no room for
any more. I have no personal interest in Objective-C 2.0, but was
merely
On Oct 27, 2007, at 17:12, David Corking wrote:
On 10/27/07, Adam Mercer wrote:
I see it's out, and I have downloaded it. But is there any
benefit to
installing it or any risk of screwing things up if I do?
Xcode 3 will only work on Leopard, from the release notes:
Does it come with a
On 10/27/07, Adam Mercer wrote:
> > I see it's out, and I have downloaded it. But is there any benefit to
> > installing it or any risk of screwing things up if I do?
>
> Xcode 3 will only work on Leopard, from the release notes:
>
Does it come with a gcc tarball - including the new objective-c
r
On 27/10/2007, paul beard <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> I see it's out, and I have downloaded it. But is there any benefit to
> installing it or any risk of screwing things up if I do?
Xcode 3 will only work on Leopard, from the release notes:
> Supported configurations
>
> Xcode 3.0 will run on M
10 matches
Mail list logo
