Re: SAMBA 3.6.3

2012-05-21 Thread James O'Dell
x27;re using that as the size, they are broken. It's not a size, it's >> the code given to sysconf() to have it return the maximum number of groups. >> >> Rather than change the SAMBA code, I just upped the value above to 32, >&

Re: SAMBA 3.6.3

2012-05-21 Thread O'Dell James
() to have it return the maximum number of groups. > > Rather than change the SAMBA code, I just upped the value above to 32, > rebuilt the > samba 3.6.3 package and all was copacetic. > > So now invoking sysconf(_SC_NGROUPS_MAX) returns instead what > sysconf(_SC_MEMORY_PROT

Re: SAMBA 3.6.3

2012-05-21 Thread Brandon Allbery
It's not a size, it's the code given to sysconf() to have it return the maximum number of groups. Rather than change the SAMBA code, I just upped the value above to 32, > rebuilt the > samba 3.6.3 package and all was copacetic. > So now invoking sysconf(_SC_NGROUPS_MAX) returns i

SAMBA 3.6.3

2012-05-21 Thread O'Dell James
: #define _SC_NGROUPS_MAX 4 In unistd.h is not large enough to contain the complete group list. Rather than change the SAMBA code, I just upped the value above to 32, rebuilt the samba 3.6.3 package and all was copacetic. I have no idea why the default value is set to 4