> On Mar 15, 2016, at 12:46 AM, [ftp83plus] wrote:
>
> Thanks all for your advices,
>
> I see contradictions here: should I start afresh and bear hours of whining
> fans like Christopher suggests to make the topic easier to follow, or try to
> add precision to my former
Thanks all for your advices,
I see contradictions here: should I start afresh and bear hours of whining fans
like Christopher suggests to make the topic easier to follow, or try to add
precision to my former request like Ryan tries to tell?
The main concern is of course the fan noise and the
> On Mar 14, 2016, at 7:55 PM, Ryan Schmidt wrote:
>
>
>> On Mar 14, 2016, at 12:14 PM, [ftp83plus] wrote:
>>
>> Right, I had to reformat because the Mac wouldn't boot anymore.
>>
>> This is actually a failure on step 1, the
>>
>> sudo port
> On Mar 14, 2016, at 12:14 PM, [ftp83plus] wrote:
>
> Right, I had to reformat because the Mac wouldn't boot anymore.
>
> This is actually a failure on step 1, the
>
> sudo port install -v -f libcxx
You mean step 2 of bootstrapping 2? Which says to run:
sudo port -v
> On 14 Mar 2016, at 5:14 pm, [ftp83plus] wrote:
>
> Right, I had to reformat because the Mac wouldn't boot anymore.
>
> This is actually a failure on step 1, the
>
> sudo port install -v -f libcxx
>
> Hope that helps.
No, not really. Like others I have I am afraid
Right, I had to reformat because the Mac wouldn't boot anymore.
This is actually a failure on step 1, the
sudo port install -v -f libcxx
Hope that helps.
Enviado desde mi iPhone
> El 14 mar 2016, a las 5:19, Ryan Schmidt escribió:
>
>
>> On Mar 14, 2016, at 2:14
On Mar 14, 2016, at 2:14 AM, [ftp83plus] wrote:
> El 2016-03-13, a las 22:14, Brandon Allbery escribió:
>
>> On Sun, Mar 13, 2016 at 10:10 PM, Chris Jones
>> wrote:
>> Unordered_set is only available in C++11, which the ancient gcc 4.2 compiler
So is it a case of missing instruction or variant?
That one dependency would precisely need the very compiler I am trying to
install in case I happen to need it for a recent software written under
C++11standard?
El 2016-03-13, a las 22:14, Brandon Allbery escribió:
> On Sun, Mar 13, 2016 at
On Sun, Mar 13, 2016 at 10:10 PM, Chris Jones
wrote:
> Unordered_set is only available in C++11, which the ancient gcc 4.2
> compiler being used will not support...
Then something has gone wrong because, per subject line, it's supposed to
be using a newer clang built
> On 14 Mar 2016, at 12:49 am, [ftp83plus] wrote:
>
> I thought I done that with :
>
>> sudo port clean ld64-136
>> and
>> sudo port clean libcxx
>>
>> as ld54-136 failed to compile as a dependency of libcxx. Received:
>>
>> Error: Failed to install ld64-136
>> Please
I thought I done that with :
> sudo port clean ld64-136
> and
> sudo port clean libcxx
>
> as ld54-136 failed to compile as a dependency of libcxx. Received:
>
> Error: Failed to install ld64-136
> Please see the log file for port ld64-136 for details:
>
>
> On 13 Mar 2016, at 7:02 pm, [ftp83plus] wrote:
>
> Ok, thanks for specifying.
>
> Why does it fail, now?
Because you have not changed anything... You are simply explicitly specifying
some options identical to the defaults... You need to follow the advice Ryan
has
Ok, thanks for specifying.
Why does it fail, now?
El 2016-03-13, a las 12:30, Brandon Allbery escribió:
> On Sun, Mar 13, 2016 at 5:18 AM, [ftp83plus] wrote:
> Now it's getting even more confusing for me: why would a commented out line
> still be run?
>
> The comment
On Sun, Mar 13, 2016 at 5:18 AM, [ftp83plus] wrote:
> Now it's getting even more confusing for me: why would a commented out
> line still be run?
The comment is showing you what the default action is if you don't say
anything.
--
brandon s allbery kf8nh
Now it's getting even more confusing for me: why would a commented out line
still be run?
Anyway I un-commented it and replaced "rebuild" by "report"
Log is here:
http://pastebin.com/g4A7B4Cp
But still no installation…
El 2016-03-12, a las 08:39, Ryan Schmidt escribió:
>
>> On Mar 11,
> On Mar 11, 2016, at 11:33 PM, [ftp83plus] wrote:
>
> Hi there,
>
> back after days of being unable to work on MacPorts.
>
> for revupgrade, I have, in /opt/local/etc/macports/macports.conf:
>
> #revupgrade_autorun yes
> #revupgrade_moderebuild
>
> So I
Hi there,
back after days of being unable to work on MacPorts.
for revupgrade, I have, in /opt/local/etc/macports/macports.conf:
#revupgrade_autorun yes
#revupgrade_moderebuild
So I don't think it it is the culprit.
First step of Bug Reporting Guidelines:
"Clean and try again:"
> On Feb 28, 2016, at 9:33 PM, [ftp83plus] wrote:
>
> Did that
> sudo port clean ld64-136
> and
> sudo port clean libcxx
>
> as ld54-136 failed to compile as a dependency of libcxx. Received:
>
> Error: Failed to install ld64-136
> Please see the log file for port
Did that
sudo port clean ld64-136
and
sudo port clean libcxx
as ld54-136 failed to compile as a dependency of libcxx. Received:
Error: Failed to install ld64-136
Please see the log file for port ld64-136 for details:
Hi there,
I had a serious issue with the machine, and needed to reformat the whole
machine.
One of my first step was of course to reinstall MacPorts and selfupdate it. I
started from a clean machine. But now fails to build clang-3.4. There's a full
pastebin fo the log there:
On Feb 11, 2016, at 9:06 PM, Ryan Schmidt wrote:
> On Feb 11, 2016, at 19:27, [ftp83plus] wrote:
>>
>> Hum, still fails:
>>
>> ---> Deactivating llvm-3.4 @3.4.2_8
>> ---> Unable to deactivate llvm-3.4 @3.4.2_8, the following ports depend on
>> it:
>> --->
> On Feb 12, 2016, at 09:02, Ryan Schmidt wrote:
>
>
> On Feb 11, 2016, at 9:06 PM, Ryan Schmidt wrote:
>
>> On Feb 11, 2016, at 19:27, [ftp83plus] wrote:
>>>
>>> Hum, still fails:
>>>
>>> ---> Deactivating llvm-3.4 @3.4.2_8
>>> ---> Unable
Hello,
that worked, thanks to all Jeremy, Ryan, Bradley and Rainer!
El 12 févr. 2016, a las 12:46, Jeremy Huddleston Sequoia escribió:
>
>> On Feb 12, 2016, at 09:02, Ryan Schmidt wrote:
>>
>>
>> On Feb 11, 2016, at 9:06 PM, Ryan Schmidt wrote:
>>
>>> On Feb 11,
> On Feb 11, 2016, at 10:37 AM, [ftp83plus] wrote:
>
> Not working, ld64-136 must be uninstalled first:
>
> ---> Deactivating llvm-3.4 @3.4.2_8
> ---> Unable to deactivate llvm-3.4 @3.4.2_8, the following ports depend on
> it:
> ---> ld64-136 @136_2+llvm34
>
On 2016-02-11 01:55, [ftp83plus] wrote:
> should I type
> sudo port -v uninstall cctools +llvm34
> sudo port -v uninstall ld64-136 +llvm34
>
> then do
> sudo port -v uninstall llvm-3.4 clang-3.4
> ?
>
> The guide is not too clear on the exact syntax.
Specify the version and variants as listed
Hum, still fails:
---> Deactivating llvm-3.4 @3.4.2_8
---> Unable to deactivate llvm-3.4 @3.4.2_8, the following ports depend on it:
--->ld64-136 @136_2+llvm34
Error: org.macports.deactivate for port llvm-3.4 returned: Please uninstall the
ports that depend on llvm-3.4 first.
El 11
Did you mean "ld64-136 is installed with the +llvm64 variant" ?
Just want to be sure
El 11 févr. 2016, a las 15:16, Bradley Giesbrecht escribió:
>> On Feb 11, 2016, at 10:37 AM, [ftp83plus] wrote:
>>
>> Not working, ld64-136 must be uninstalled first:
>>
>> --->
> On Feb 11, 2016, at 1:08 PM, [ftp83plus] wrote:
>
> Did you mean "ld64-136 is installed with the +llvm64 variant" ?
>
> Just want to be sure
>
> El 11 févr. 2016, a las 15:16, Bradley Giesbrecht escribió:
>
>>> On Feb 11, 2016, at 10:37 AM, [ftp83plus]
On Feb 11, 2016, at 19:27, [ftp83plus] wrote:
>
> Hum, still fails:
>
> ---> Deactivating llvm-3.4 @3.4.2_8
> ---> Unable to deactivate llvm-3.4 @3.4.2_8, the following ports depend on
> it:
> ---> ld64-136 @136_2+llvm34
> Error: org.macports.deactivate for port
> On Feb 10, 2016, at 16:55, [ftp83plus] wrote:
>
> Thanks both,
>
> should I type
> sudo port -v uninstall cctools +llvm34
> sudo port -v uninstall ld64-136 +llvm34
>
> then do
> sudo port -v uninstall llvm-3.4 clang-3.4
> ?
>
> The guide is not too clear on the
Not working, ld64-136 must be uninstalled first:
---> Deactivating llvm-3.4 @3.4.2_8
---> Unable to deactivate llvm-3.4 @3.4.2_8, the following ports depend on it:
--->ld64-136 @136_2+llvm34
Error: org.macports.deactivate for port llvm-3.4 returned: Please uninstall the
ports that depend
Thanks both,
should I type
sudo port -v uninstall cctools +llvm34
sudo port -v uninstall ld64-136 +llvm34
then do
sudo port -v uninstall llvm-3.4 clang-3.4
?
The guide is not too clear on the exact syntax.
Pat
El 9 févr. 2016, a las 15:26, Jeremy Huddleston Sequoia escribió:
>
>> On Feb
On Feb 9, 2016, at 13:30, [ftp83plus] wrote:
>
> Ok, after a night of fetching-compiling, it now fails at step 6
>
> ---> Unable to uninstall llvm-3.4 @3.4.2_8, the following ports depend on it:
> ---> cctools @877.5_2+llvm34
> ---> ld64-136 @136_2+llvm34
I
> On Feb 9, 2016, at 12:12, Ryan Schmidt wrote:
>
> On Feb 9, 2016, at 13:30, [ftp83plus] wrote:
>>
>> Ok, after a night of fetching-compiling, it now fails at step 6
>>
>> ---> Unable to uninstall llvm-3.4 @3.4.2_8, the following ports depend
Ok, after a night of fetching-compiling, it now fails at step 6
---> Unable to uninstall llvm-3.4 @3.4.2_8, the following ports depend on it:
--->cctools @877.5_2+llvm34
--->ld64-136 @136_2+llvm34
Error: org.macports.uninstall for port llvm-3.4 returned: Please uninstall the
ports that
On 9 February 2016 at 20:30, [ftp83plus] wrote:
> Ok, after a night of fetching-compiling, it now fails at step 6
>
> ---> Unable to uninstall llvm-3.4 @3.4.2_8, the following ports depend on it:
> --->cctools @877.5_2+llvm34
> --->ld64-136 @136_2+llvm34
> Error:
On Feb 8, 2016, at 12:07 AM, [ftp83plus] wrote:
>
> Hi,
>
> I assumed that because it is extremely rare not to get an answer from either
> Brandon, Ryan or Adam. I see them having an answer to practically every
> single request on the list…
These are Jeremy's
> On Feb 8, 2016, at 13:35, [ftp83plus] wrote:
>
> libffi or clang?
But you already had clang-3.7 installed, so why are you doing that? I have no
idea what the state of your system is here.
However, since you were seeing an issue building libffi, file a bug against
I just restarted from scratch, uninstalling all traces of MacPorts first,
although I'd rather avoid it because of the time involved to compile every
dependency and fan noise.
Let me try once again…
El 8 févr. 2016, a las 23:01, Jeremy Huddleston Sequoia escribió:
>
>> On Feb 8, 2016, at
On Mon, Feb 8, 2016 at 7:07 AM, [ftp83plus] wrote:
> them having an answer to practically every single request…
It is not fear, I think, to get used to or require them to be the ones who
assume the care responsibility of our issues.
We are a community, I believe.
Just
On Mon, Feb 8, 2016 at 1:07 AM, [ftp83plus] wrote:
>
> I assumed that because it is extremely rare not to get an answer from
> either Brandon, Ryan or Adam. I see them having an answer to practically
> every single request on the list…
>
I don't know much about this one,
What is the command you are envoking and when?
You should only be rebuilding the cctools and ld64 ports. There's really no
reason for all those other ports to be installed.
--Jeremy
> On Feb 8, 2016, at 12:31, [ftp83plus] wrote:
>
> Not much success: it now fails to
Not much success: it now fails to install clang-3.7
---> Cleaning libffi
---> Removing work directory for libffi
Error: The following dependencies were not installed: cctools clang-3.4
clang-3.3 clang_select ld64 ld64-136 libmacho-headers llvm-3.4 llvm_select
ncurses zlib xz gettext expat
Apparently these ports are dependencies… Will file a ticket.
El 8 févr. 2016, a las 16:13, Jeremy Huddleston Sequoia escribió:
> What is the command you are envoking and when?
>
> You should only be rebuilding the cctools and ld64 ports. There's really no
> reason for all those other ports
> On Feb 8, 2016, at 12:31, [ftp83plus] wrote:
>
> Not much success: it now fails to install clang-3.7
Oh, are you failing at the point when installing clang-3.7? How is that
possible? Your previous email was about an issue *AFTER* that point.
Regardless, it looks
libffi or clang?
Don't know for which port to file the ticket. I did:
$ sudo port clean clang-3.7
---> Cleaning clang-3.7
Then:
$ sudo port -v install clang-3.7
---> Computing dependencies for clang-3.7..
---> Dependencies to be installed: cctools clang-3.4
> On Feb 8, 2016, at 03:44, Ryan Schmidt wrote:
>
> On Feb 8, 2016, at 12:07 AM, [ftp83plus] wrote:
>>
>> Hi,
>>
>> I assumed that because it is extremely rare not to get an answer from either
>> Brandon, Ryan or Adam. I see them having an
On Sun, Feb 7, 2016 at 1:05 AM, [ftp83plus] wrote:
> excuse me for double-post…
>
Your first message was received, but being me just an unskilled user I have
not dared to answer.
sudo port -v uninstall llvm-3.4 clang-3.4
> I get
> Warning: Failed to execute portfile from
48 matches
Mail list logo