On Fri, Apr 20, 2012 at 04:32, Kamesh Krishnamurthy wrote:
> Do you think MKL can be included as a variant?
Patches are welcome.
Cheers
Adam
___
macports-users mailing list
macports-users@lists.macosforge.org
http://lists.macosforge.org/mailman/listi
The MKL-based NumPy is around 4 times faster than the Accelerate Framework,
and is faster than Atlas as well (2-3x).
It should be possible to incorporate MKL with the NumPy/SciPy in Macports.
Intel allows free download of its MKL libraries for non-commercial use:
http://software.intel.com/en-us/a
On Tue, Apr 17, 2012 at 14:17, Frank Schima
wrote:
> py-numpy and py-scipy have atlas variants which use the atlas port instead
> of the Accelerate framework. The atlas port does tune to your processor.
> Have you tried that? I have Cc'ed Adam, the maintainer of these ports, if he
> could comment
py-numpy and py-scipy have atlas variants which use the atlas port instead of
the Accelerate framework. The atlas port does tune to your processor. Have you
tried that? I have Cc'ed Adam, the maintainer of these ports, if he could
comment on their performance with the atlas variant? Maybe the In
Hi,
On 17 Apr 2012, at 7:56pm, Kamesh Krishnamurthy wrote:
> My main reason for using Enthought Python is that they build Numpy and Scipy
> with intel MKL libraries -- these are significantly faster than the
> Accelerate framework on the Mac which MacPorts Numpy and Scipy use.
Based on the In
My main reason for using Enthought Python is that they build Numpy and
Scipy with intel MKL libraries -- these are significantly faster than the
Accelerate framework on the Mac which MacPorts Numpy and Scipy use.
It would be great if MacPorts can include the Intel MKL runtime libraries
in their di
In article <71147bab-dd71-4110-91d9-e7bb11370...@fusion.gat.com>,
Sterling Smith wrote:
> I do not use the Enthought python distribution, but in other python
> distributions the path that is searched for modules is affected by the
> PYTHONPATH environment variable, and is also accessible/editab
o/add/')
-Sterling
> Date: Tue, 17 Apr 2012 16:15:17 +0300
> From: Kamesh Krishnamurthy
> To: macports-users@lists.macosforge.org
> Subject: Using MacPorts Python packages in different Python
> Message-ID:
>
> Content-Type: text/plain; charset="iso-8859-1"
>
>> Is there a clean way to make the MacPorts packages available to the
>> Enthought Python without breaking anything? I'd prefer not having multiple
>> copies of rope, pymacs etc., if possible.
>
> They're not designed to be used that way; I don't know if they can be made to
> work that way.
>
On Apr 17, 2012, at 08:15, Kamesh Krishnamurthy wrote:
> I have two installations of Python 2.7.2 -- from MacPorts and Enthought -- on
> my Mac. I use the Enthought Python as the primary one for performance
> reasons(MKL Blas included); however, my MacPorts distribution has several
> additiona
Hello,
I have two installations of Python 2.7.2 -- from MacPorts and Enthought --
on my Mac. I use the Enthought Python as the primary one for performance
reasons(MKL Blas included); however, my MacPorts distribution has several
additional packages like pymacs, rope etc., which I would like to mak
11 matches
Mail list logo
