Re: Variant conflicts

On Sat, Nov 21, 2015 at 3:03 AM, Bachsau wrote: > Would be very bad if I had to choose between Nautilus or gtk3 with quartz. I suggest you go take a close look at the Gnome 3 community, including its politics. My understanding is that Gnome 3 targets Wayland; there are

Re: Variant conflicts

Eric A. Borisch wrote on 21.11.2015 05:45: Unfortunately, the portfile states that "portions of this port are X11 specific so a +quartz build is not possible." I don't know the specifics, but I'm guessing it's not trivial. I don't think so. According to my experience with debians package

Re: Variant conflicts

Hi, - On 21 Nov, 2015, at 09:03, Bachsau w...@bachsau.name wrote: > I don't think so. According to my experience with debians package > system, many such dependencies are just mistakes of the maintainers or > only cause problems in just one of many usage scenarios ("portions of > this

Re: Variant conflicts

On Friday, November 20, 2015, Bachsau wrote: > > > Am 19.11.2015 um 00:09 schrieb Eric A. Borisch >: > > > > port echo active and variant:quartz and variant:x11 \ > > | sed -n -e '/\+quartz/d;s/@[^+-]*//;s/\+x11/-x11+quartz/p' \ > > |

Re: Variant conflicts

> Am 19.11.2015 um 00:09 schrieb Eric A. Borisch : > > port echo active and variant:quartz and variant:x11 \ > | sed -n -e '/\+quartz/d;s/@[^+-]*//;s/\+x11/-x11+quartz/p' \ > | xargs -n 2 That worked, thanks. But it resulted in another problem. >:(( > Error:

Variant conflicts

On Thu, Nov 19, 2015 at 11:07 AM, Gustavo Seabra > wrote: > I apologize for my ignorance… What rest was just for fun? Will the command work even in the presence of the ports that don’t have a +quartz? and, in this case, what would happen to those? > > The

Re: Variant conflicts

Thanks! Gustavo Seabra > Em 19 de nov de 2015, à(s) 17:22, Eric A. Borisch > escreveu: > > On Thu, Nov 19, 2015 at 11:07 AM, Gustavo Seabra > wrote: > > I apologize for my ignorance… What rest was just for fun? Will the command > > work

Re: Variant conflicts

And there are many +x11 ports that do not have a +quartz, so I would stick with the port echo command I listed. The rest was for fun. On Thursday, November 19, 2015, Eric A. Borisch wrote: > He specifically asked for a way to find and reinstall, not just find. I >

Re: Variant conflicts

I apologize for my ignorance… What rest was just for fun? Will the command work even in the presence of the ports that don’t have a +quartz? and, in this case, what would happen to those? The complex command Eric presented earlier is very useful to me as well. I won’t memorize it either, but I

Re: Variant conflicts

2015-11-19 0:09 GMT+01:00 Eric A. Borisch wrote: > On Wed, Nov 18, 2015 at 3:29 PM, Bachsau wrote: > >> Is there a way to find all ports still installed with +x11 and >> reinstall with quartz instead? > > Try this first: > > port echo active and variant:quartz and variant:x11 \ > | sed -n -e

Re: Variant conflicts

He specifically asked for a way to find and reinstall, not just find. I provided one. ;) On Thursday, November 19, 2015, Mojca Miklavec wrote: > 2015-11-19 0:09 GMT+01:00 Eric A. Borisch wrote: > > On Wed, Nov 18, 2015 at 3:29 PM, Bachsau wrote: > > > >> Is there a way to

Re: Variant conflicts

Most likely, you have installed a port that doesn't support quartz, but that directly or indirectly depends on gtk3. Russell On 18/11/15 07:45, Bachsau wrote: Hi there! Today I ran a port upgrade outdated and got the following message: Error: gtk3: Variant quartz conflicts with x11 Error:

Re: Variant conflicts

You are using upgrade; what does 'port active and gtk3' show? +x11 perhaps? >From the man page: By selecting the variants to use in the upgraded build of the port, any variants specified on the command line take highest precedence, then the variants active in the latest installed version of the

Variant conflicts

Try this first: port echo active and variant:quartz and variant:x11 \ | sed -n -e '/\+quartz/d;s/@[^+-]*//;s/\+x11/-x11+quartz/p' \ | xargs -n 2 If it looks reasonable (each output line should be with no portion of the version string before the variant selections; could happen if a version

Re: Variant conflicts

Eric A. Borisch wrote on 18.11.2015 15:43: You are using upgrade; what does 'port active and gtk3' show? +x11 perhaps? From the man page: By selecting the variants to use in the upgraded build of the port, any variants specified on the command line take highest precedence, then the variants

Variant conflicts

Hi there! Today I ran a port upgrade outdated and got the following message: > Error: gtk3: Variant quartz conflicts with x11 > Error: Unable to open port: Error evaluating variants But my variants.conf is > -x11 +no_x11 +quartz +bash_completion So whats going on? There's a minus in front of