Re: apache 2.4

2012-04-20 Thread Bjarne D Mathiesen
Ryan Schmidt wrote: > > On Apr 19, 2012, at 18:17, Bjarne D Mathiesen wrote: > >> Ryan Schmidt wrote >>> >>> When we actually commit the update to apache2 2.4.x, we'd have to >>> increase the revision of every module port that we want to get rebuilt. >> >> Do you have a procedure for doing this o

Re: apache 2.4

2012-04-19 Thread Ryan Schmidt
On Apr 19, 2012, at 18:17, Bjarne D Mathiesen wrote: > Ryan Schmidt wrote >> >> When we actually commit the update to apache2 2.4.x, we'd have to >> increase the revision of every module port that we want to get rebuilt. > > Do you have a procedure for doing this or are you interested in a scri

Re: apache 2.4

2012-04-19 Thread Bjarne D Mathiesen
Ryan Schmidt wrote > > When we actually commit the update to apache2 2.4.x, we'd have to > increase the revision of every module port that we want to get rebuilt. Do you have a procedure for doing this or are you interested in a script that'll generate the diff files ??? -- Bjarne D Mathiesen K

Re: apache 2.4

2012-04-19 Thread Bjarne D Mathiesen
forward from Ryan Schmidt On Apr 19, 2012, at 15:24, Bjarne D Mathiesen wrote: > wrote: >>> Apparently it breaks (almost) all plugins (new API/ABI), from what I have been hearing. >> I just read in their notes that all plugins must be recompiled, and that only a few source changes might be requi

Re: apache 2.4

2012-04-19 Thread Daniel J. Luke
On Apr 19, 2012, at 4:24 PM, Bjarne D Mathiesen wrote: > mod_fastcgi @2.4.6_0 (active) This one won't work without a patch (you could probably use mod_fcgid or mod_proxy_fcgi instead, though) -- Daniel J. Luke +

Re: apache 2.4

2012-04-19 Thread Bjarne D Mathiesen
Ryan Schmidt wrote: >> Apparently it breaks (almost) all plugins (new API/ABI), from what I have >> been hearing. > > I just read in their notes that all plugins must be recompiled, and that only > a few source changes might be required. But I have not tried it. > > If anyone tries 2.4.2, let

Re: apache 2.4

2012-04-19 Thread Daniel J. Luke
can patch subversion in MacPorts so that it builds with apache 2.4 if/when the apache2 maintainer wants to update :) -- Daniel J. Luke ++

Re: apache 2.4

2012-04-19 Thread Ralph Seichter
On 19.04.12 19:16, Daniel J. Luke wrote: > looks like a tiny patch to util.c makes it build (save_errno -> aprerr). > I haven't tested it though. The best suggested patch (or rather code used in SVN trunk) I've seen so far is mentioned here: http://svn.haxx.se/dev/archive-2012-02/0537.shtml I'm

Re: apache 2.4

2012-04-19 Thread Daniel J. Luke
On Apr 19, 2012, at 12:54 PM, Ralph Seichter wrote: > On 19.04.12 18:48, Daniel J. Luke wrote: >> I believe subversion version since something like 1.6.5 could build >> against apache 2.4 > > Apache 2.4 introduces some API changes. You'll see compile errors like these: &

Re: apache 2.4

2012-04-19 Thread Ralph Seichter
On 19.04.12 18:48, Daniel J. Luke wrote: > I believe subversion version since something like 1.6.5 could build > against apache 2.4 Apache 2.4 introduces some API changes. You'll see compile errors like these: subversion/mod_dav_svn/util.c: In function 'dav_svn__log_err': s

Re: apache 2.4

2012-04-19 Thread Daniel J. Luke
It would be nice to see some details here (I'll maybe try building it when I get some time). I believe subversion version since something like 1.6.5 could build against apache 2.4 I don't personally use mod_dav_svn, so I haven't tried b

Re: apache 2.4

2012-04-19 Thread Ryan Schmidt
On Apr 19, 2012, at 09:01, Bjarne D Mathiesen wrote: > Ryan Schmidt wrote: >> >> I just read in their notes that all plugins must be recompiled, and that >> only a few source changes might be required. But I have not tried it. >> >> If anyone tries 2.4.2, let me know the results. > > Do we ne

Re: apache 2.4

2012-04-19 Thread Bjarne D Mathiesen
Ryan Schmidt wrote: > > I just read in their notes that all plugins must be recompiled, and that only > a few source changes might be required. But I have not tried it. > > If anyone tries 2.4.2, let me know the results. Do we need a new apache24 port? I think that livecheck didn't pick 2.4 up

Re: apache 2.4

2012-04-19 Thread sierkb
Am 19.04.2012 um 03:09 schrieb Ryan Schmidt: >> >> Apparently it breaks (almost) all plugins (new API/ABI), from what I have >> been hearing. > > I just read in their notes that all plugins must be recompiled, and that only > a few source changes might be required. But I have not tried it. Ap

Re: apache 2.4

2012-04-19 Thread Ralph Seichter
On 19.04.12 00:46, Ryan Schmidt wrote: > I wonder if I can just update the apache2 port or if this will cause > problems. I did some tests, and found that Subversion 1.7.4 does not compile against Apache 2.4.2. This is not MacPorts-specific, though. -Ralph ___

Re: apache 2.4

2012-04-18 Thread Ryan Schmidt
On Apr 18, 2012, at 20:03, Brandon Allbery wrote: > On Wed, Apr 18, 2012 at 18:46, Ryan Schmidt wrote: >> On Apr 18, 2012, at 17:39, Bjarne D Mathiesen wrote: >> > Apache 2.4.1 was released on 21/02-2012 >> > What's the status on supporting it in MacPorts ? >> >> I was not aware it was availabl

Re: apache 2.4

2012-04-18 Thread Brandon Allbery
On Wed, Apr 18, 2012 at 18:46, Ryan Schmidt wrote: > On Apr 18, 2012, at 17:39, Bjarne D Mathiesen wrote: > > Apache 2.4.1 was released on 21/02-2012 > > What's the status on supporting it in MacPorts ? > > I was not aware it was available, so thanks for letting us know. I guess > the apache2 por

Re: apache 2.4

2012-04-18 Thread Ryan Schmidt
On Apr 18, 2012, at 17:39, Bjarne D Mathiesen wrote: > Apache 2.4.1 was released on 21/02-2012 > What's the status on supporting it in MacPorts ? I was not aware it was available, so thanks for letting us know. I guess the apache2 port's livecheck needs adjustment. Looks like 2.4.2 was released

apache 2.4

2012-04-18 Thread Bjarne D Mathiesen
Apache 2.4.1 was released on 21/02-2012 What's the status on supporting it in MacPorts ? -- Bjarne D Mathiesen København N ; Danmark ; Europa -- denne besked er skrevet i et totalt M$-frit miljø MacOS X 10.7.3 Lion ; 2.8GHz Intel