On Sat, Oct 15, 2016 at 3:43 PM, Ken Cunningham <
ken.cunningham.web...@gmail.com> wrote:
> I'm a bit curious why the comparison is successful and the build proceeds
> when the checksum differs like that ... I'm actually not sure which build
> attempt is the more valid. Perhaps it is supposed to
>>
>> on the other, the checksum differs and it says comparison successful.
I'm a bit curious why the comparison is successful and the build proceeds when
the checksum differs like that ... I'm actually not sure which build attempt
is the more valid. Perhaps it is supposed to fail, and the er
On Oct 15, 2016, at 11:07, Ken Cunningham wrote:
> Weird. Is this on the same exact machine?
Yes.
> on one hand the checksum differs and it says bootstrap fails.
> on the other, the checksum differs and it says comparison sucessful.
>
>
> No difference in file system / case sensitivitiy?
Weird. Is this on the same exact machine?
on one hand the checksum differs and it says bootstrap fails.
on the other, the checksum differs and it says comparison sucessful.
No difference in file system / case sensitivitiy?
? race condition involving parallel build threads?
on one hand the check
> On Oct 15, 2016, at 07:58, Davide Liessi wrote:
>
> 2016-10-14 2:00 GMT+02:00 Ryan Schmidt :
>> For some reason the 10.6 x86_64 builder didn't build it either so we didn't
>> have a gcc6-6.2.0_0.darwin_10.x86_64.tbz2 package. It's not easy to find old
>> buildbot logs so I don't know if it
2016-10-14 2:00 GMT+02:00 Ryan Schmidt :
> For some reason the 10.6 x86_64 builder didn't build it either so we didn't
> have a gcc6-6.2.0_0.darwin_10.x86_64.tbz2 package. It's not easy to find old
> buildbot logs so I don't know if it failed because of the same bootstrap
> failure you saw or fo
> On Oct 14, 2016, at 11:07, Ryan Schmidt wrote:
>
> On Oct 14, 2016, at 09:51, Richard L. Hamilton wrote:
>>
>>
>>> On Oct 13, 2016, at 20:00, Ryan Schmidt wrote:
>>>
>>> On Oct 13, 2016, at 16:58, Richard L. Hamilton wrote:
This was a build prerequisite for py27-numpy, so I ca
On Oct 14, 2016, at 09:51, Richard L. Hamilton wrote:
>
>
>> On Oct 13, 2016, at 20:00, Ryan Schmidt wrote:
>>
>> On Oct 13, 2016, at 16:58, Richard L. Hamilton wrote:
>>>
>>> This was a build prerequisite for py27-numpy, so I can't build that either.
>>> It failed both with and without +u
> On Oct 13, 2016, at 20:00, Ryan Schmidt wrote:
>
> On Oct 13, 2016, at 16:58, Richard L. Hamilton wrote:
>>
>> This was a build prerequisite for py27-numpy, so I can't build that either.
>> It failed both with and without +universal (I think I have the latter set as
>> default).
>
> For
On Oct 13, 2016, at 16:58, Richard L. Hamilton wrote:
>
> This was a build prerequisite for py27-numpy, so I can't build that either.
> It failed both with and without +universal (I think I have the latter set as
> default).
For some reason the 10.6 x86_64 builder didn't build it either so we
gcc6 @6.1.0_0 platform='darwin 10' archs='x86_64'
gcc6 @6.2.0_0 (active) platform='darwin 10' archs='x86_64'
libgcc @6.1.0_0 platform='darwin 10' archs='x86_64'
libgcc @6.2.0_0 (active) platform='darwin 10' archs='x86_64'
It does build -- but I recall there was something, perhaps ... I'l
This was a build prerequisite for py27-numpy, so I can't build that either. It
failed both with and without +universal (I think I have the latter set as
default).
Hardware Version: Mac mini (Mid 2007)
Model Identifier: Macmini2,1
Mac OS X 10.6.8 10K549 (Snow Leopard)
Xcode 3.2.6 DevToolsSuppor
12 matches
Mail list logo
