On 2007-12-17 13:35:00 +0100, Joerg van den Hoff wrote:
since `ion3' actually is a very fine window manager for a
certain type of work, may I ask you to check whether it
would'nt be sufficient to modify the package info line
accordingly with some wildcard disclaimer of the kind:
On Mon, Dec 17, 2007 at 02:01:58PM +0100, Vincent Lefevre wrote:
On 2007-12-17 13:35:00 +0100, Joerg van den Hoff wrote:
since `ion3' actually is a very fine window manager for a
certain type of work, may I ask you to check whether it
would'nt be sufficient to modify the
On Mon, Dec 17, 2007 at 12:22:20PM -0500, William Davis wrote:
On Dec 17, 2007, at 10:44 AM, Joerg van den Hoff wrote:
On Mon, Dec 17, 2007 at 02:01:58PM +0100, Vincent Lefevre wrote:
On 2007-12-17 13:35:00 +0100, Joerg van den Hoff wrote:
since `ion3' actually is a very fine window
On 2007-12-17 19:04:17 +0100, Joerg van den Hoff wrote:
On Mon, Dec 17, 2007 at 12:22:20PM -0500, William Davis wrote:
Because using the name ion3 in any form would be a license violation.
ok, got it. but the debian solution (some other arbitrary name) would
work. so why can't you just
