Re: lib release

2012-04-08 Thread Ryan Schmidt
On Apr 8, 2012, at 06:12, Daniel Ericsson wrote: > I'd make a distinction between ports that only supply an end user binary and > those that supply a library that can be developed against. Doesn't feel > unreasonable to me to add debug variants to ports that supply libraries with > the underst

Re: lib release

2012-04-08 Thread Daniel Ericsson
On 8 apr 2012, at 07:17, Ryan Schmidt wrote: > On Apr 7, 2012, at 06:30, Daniel Ericsson wrote: > >> As an aside I'm curious why you need debug builds of these libraries? >> Developing against a normal release build shouldn't really be a problem. My >> perception is that mostly debug builds are

Re: lib release

2012-04-08 Thread Brandon Allbery
While noting the rest of your response, I would like to point out that... On Sun, Apr 8, 2012 at 02:05, Ryan Schmidt wrote: > Users using the debug variant will also not benefit from the buildbot's > precompiled binaries ...arguably if they need the debug variant, they *should* be building it

Re: lib release

2012-04-07 Thread Ryan Schmidt
On Apr 8, 2012, at 00:29, Brandon Allbery wrote: > On Sun, Apr 8, 2012 at 01:17, Ryan Schmidt wrote: >> I expressed the same reservations there. An answer was provided there. I >> don't know how to respond to it; I'm not sure if this is a road MacPorts >> wants to start down. > > I'll bite: th

Re: lib release

2012-04-07 Thread Brandon Allbery
On Sun, Apr 8, 2012 at 01:17, Ryan Schmidt wrote: > I expressed the same reservations there. An answer was provided there. I > don't know how to respond to it; I'm not sure if this is a road MacPorts > wants to start down. I'll bite: the road that you apparently don't want MacPorts to start do

Re: lib release

2012-04-07 Thread Ryan Schmidt
On Apr 6, 2012, at 05:47, Marko Vranic wrote: > I'm interested in these libraries(these versions): > > tiff/3.9.5 > boost/1.44 > jpeg/8b > lcms/2.1 > zlib/1.2.5 > freetype/1.4.3 > > Are these release or debug builds? For most of those ports (all except tiff), those are not the versions that ar

Re: lib release

2012-04-07 Thread Ryan Schmidt
On Apr 7, 2012, at 06:30, Daniel Ericsson wrote: > As for what changes you need to make, some of these probably just need "-g > -DDEBUG" added to their CFLAGS, others might need edits to header files. I'd > take note of what changes are needed and then open tickets with request for > enhanceme

Re: lib release

2012-04-07 Thread Daniel Ericsson
On 7 apr 2012, at 10:35, Marko Vranic wrote: > Ok, > > How can get release builds? Please reply-all so the mailing list can contribute to the discussion. I would investigate how to do a debug build for each of the library, then install them in a multi-step approach. 1. `port extract `, the di

Re: lib release

2012-04-06 Thread Daniel Ericsson
On 6 apr 2012, at 12:47, Marko Vranic wrote: > Hi, > > I'm interested in these libraries(these versions): > > tiff/3.9.5 > boost/1.44 > jpeg/8b > lcms/2.1 > zlib/1.2.5 > freetype/1.4.3 > > Are these release or debug builds? You can generally assume that, unless a port has a debug variant, Macp

lib release

2012-04-06 Thread Marko Vranic
Hi, I'm interested in these libraries(these versions): tiff/3.9.5 boost/1.44 jpeg/8b lcms/2.1 zlib/1.2.5 freetype/1.4.3 Are these release or debug builds? Thanks, Marko ___ macports-users mailing list macports-users@lists.macosforge.org http://lists.m