> On Jan 12, 2017, at 4:41 PM, Daniel J. Luke wrote:
>
> On Jan 12, 2017, at 4:08 PM, Adam Dershowitz wrote:
>> But, if there are actually any ports that I have where +universal is the
>> default, and is necessary, that would break them, and their chain of
>> dependancies. I don’t know if t
On Jan 13, 2017, at 8:26 AM, Adam Dershowitz wrote:
> I uninstalled all ports, and then tried to just install my requested ports,
> with variants, that I wanted. Almost all were just default and none of these
> were +universal. But, when it got to install wine-devel, it proceeded to
> install
> On Jan 13, 2017, at 9:45 AM, Daniel J. Luke wrote:
>
> On Jan 13, 2017, at 8:26 AM, Adam Dershowitz wrote:
>> I uninstalled all ports, and then tried to just install my requested ports,
>> with variants, that I wanted. Almost all were just default and none of
>> these were +universal. Bu
On Jan 13, 2017, at 9:50 AM, Adam Dershowitz wrote:
>> The dependency engine in MacPorts doesn't really handle variants, so I
>> always expect everything that does magic with variants to have problems like
>> this (the difference in +universal ports probably just depends on the order
>> that th
> On Jan 13, 2017, at 9:56 AM, Daniel J. Luke wrote:
>
> On Jan 13, 2017, at 9:50 AM, Adam Dershowitz wrote:
>>> The dependency engine in MacPorts doesn't really handle variants, so I
>>> always expect everything that does magic with variants to have problems
>>> like this (the difference in
> So, this suggests that there might be some combination of the long list of
> ports below that I could uninstall +universal, then install default, and that
> might allow wine to build?
well, I was suggesting that you can even 'uninstall' any 'build' dependencies
after they've been used to bui
> On Jan 13, 2017, at 10:58 AM, Daniel J. Luke wrote:
>
>> So, this suggests that there might be some combination of the long list of
>> ports below that I could uninstall +universal, then install default, and
>> that might allow wine to build?
>
> well, I was suggesting that you can even '
Hey Folks,
When I try to install p7zip on Sierra the port file runs and appears to
complete, but I don't get a viable executable.
Can someone confirm this?
Thank you.
--
Best Regards,
Chris
On Jan 14, 2017, at 00:38, Christopher Stone wrote:
> When I try to install p7zip on Sierra the port file runs and appears to
> complete, but I don't get a viable executable.
>
> Can someone confirm this?
Could you describe in what way the executable is not viable?
On Jan 14, 2017, at 01:11, Ryan Schmidt wrote:
> On Jan 14, 2017, at 00:38, Christopher Stone wrote:
>
>> When I try to install p7zip on Sierra the port file runs and appears to
>> complete, but I don't get a viable executable.
>>
>> Can someone confirm this?
>
> Could you describe in what way
10 matches
Mail list logo
