Re: Help wanted: unbuffer, or stdbuf

Both should be there port contents coreutils | grep stdb # bins are prefixed with g port contents expect | grep unbuffer On 31 Jan 2017, at 05:27, Michael wrote: > So I wanted to linebuffer a program that is feeding into a pipe. > > Looking around with Google, I found two

Re: Help wanted: unbuffer, or stdbuf

On 31 Jan 2017, at 06:47, Michael wrote: > Nope, /usr/bin. Which package installs script? util-linux

Re: Help wanted: unbuffer, or stdbuf

On 2017-01-30, at 9:44 PM, Brandon Allbery wrote: > On Mon, Jan 30, 2017 at 11:38 PM, Brandon Allbery wrote: > Both of these programs rely on APIs that only exist in GNU glibc, not BSD > libc or OS X libSystem. > > There are sometimes hacky ways

Re: Help wanted: unbuffer, or stdbuf

On Mon, Jan 30, 2017 at 11:27 PM, Michael wrote: > So I wanted to linebuffer a program that is feeding into a pipe. > > Looking around with Google, I found two solutions: > 1, unbuffer, from expect, or > 2, stdbuf, from the gnu core utils. > > I've got expect 5.45. I've got

Help wanted: unbuffer, or stdbuf

So I wanted to linebuffer a program that is feeding into a pipe. Looking around with Google, I found two solutions: 1, unbuffer, from expect, or 2, stdbuf, from the gnu core utils. I've got expect 5.45. I've got core utils. I don't seem to have either. Help please? --- Entertaining minecraft

Port diagnose - symlinks

I ran 'port diagnose' and I think there's an issue with how it handles symlinks. Specifically: > Checking for file '/opt/local/libexec/texlive/binaries/a2ping' on disk... > [FAILED] > Checking for file '/opt/local/libexec/texlive/binaries/a5toa4' on disk... > [FAILED] > Checking for file

Re: Prevent MacPorts editing .bash_profile over and over again...

Hi, On Mon, Jan 30, 2017 at 05:37:41PM +, Barry Scott wrote: > > On 30 Jan 2017, at 12:44, Barry Scott wrote: > > > > When I run the postinstall as me it works are intended for my > > .bash_profile. When I run via sudo it looks at root’s file and > > states tit does

Re: Prevent MacPorts editing .bash_profile over and over again...

> On 30 Jan 2017, at 12:44, Barry Scott wrote: > > When I run the postinstall as me it works are intended for my .bash_profile. > When I run via sudo it looks at root’s file and states tit does not support > the > “sh” shell. I suspect that the environment that

Re: Prevent MacPorts editing .bash_profile over and over again...

When I run the postinstall as me it works are intended for my .bash_profile. When I run via sudo it looks at root’s file and states tit does not support the “sh” shell. I suspect that the environment that postinstall is running in is a strange in some way. (I have seen Mac specific oddities when