Re: Apple ARM binary codesign issue

2020-09-23 Thread Ryan Schmidt
On Sep 22, 2020, at 18:05, Richard L. Hamilton wrote: > How will additional signing requirements impact MacPorts binary distribution > (which is a huge timesaver for installs and updates, if one doesn't have to > build most packages oneself)? As I understand it, it should not affect that at

Re: Apple ARM binary codesign issue

2020-09-23 Thread Ryan Schmidt
On Sep 22, 2020, at 17:24, Ken Cunningham wrote: > On 2020-09-22, at 12:58 PM, Ryan Schmidt wrote: >> >> To me it seems unrealistic for Apple to suggest that an infinite number of >> open source projects, many of whose developers have never seen a Mac, should >> now add code to their build

Re: Apple ARM binary codesign issue

2020-09-23 Thread Ryan Schmidt
On Sep 23, 2020, at 03:37, Ruben Di Battista wrote: > Can't be an easier choice to push globally a linker switch, if it exists, to > disable codesigning altogether for MP software? macOS 11 on ARM now require codesigning. Binaries that are not codesigned cannot be used at all.

RE: Apple ARM binary codesign issue

2020-09-23 Thread Leandro neto
look please!! leandro leme neto phone +552122366155 +552121796156 https://photos.app.goo.gl/eZ1qaq6xiciZLdDq9 https://photos.app.goo.gl/vMh9wRVp9yYV2TJ47 https://photos.app.goo.gl/eq6Jp4E7BBPhtYWw6 https://photos.app.goo.gl/wHHNkfgEqz4H7kE36 https://photos.app.goo.gl/43BGYWcySozdvmJW9

RE: Apple ARM binary codesign issue SEVERE SUCURITY VUNERABILITY

2020-09-23 Thread Leandro neto
  look please!! leandro leme neto phone +552122366155 +552121796156 https://photos.app.goo.gl/eZ1qaq6xiciZLdDq9 https://photos.app.goo.gl/vMh9wRVp9yYV2TJ47 https://photos.app.goo.gl/eq6Jp4E7BBPhtYWw6 https://photos.app.goo.gl/wHHNkfgEqz4H7kE36 https://photos.app.goo.gl/43BGYWcySozdvmJW9

RE: Apple ARM binary codesign issue

2020-09-23 Thread Leandro neto
  Please look +552122366155 +552121796156 Leandro https://photos.app.goo.gl/eZ1qaq6xiciZLdDq9 https://photos.app.goo.gl/vMh9wRVp9yYV2TJ47 https://photos.app.goo.gl/eq6Jp4E7BBPhtYWw6 https://photos.app.goo.gl/wHHNkfgEqz4H7kE36 https://photos.app.goo.gl/43BGYWcySozdvmJW9

RE: Apple ARM binary codesign issue

2020-09-23 Thread Leandro neto
look please!! phone +552122366155 +552121796156 https://photos.app.goo.gl/eZ1qaq6xiciZLdDq9 https://photos.app.goo.gl/vMh9wRVp9yYV2TJ47 https://photos.app.goo.gl/eq6Jp4E7BBPhtYWw6 https://photos.app.goo.gl/wHHNkfgEqz4H7kE36 https://photos.app.goo.gl/43BGYWcySozdvmJW9

Re: Failure to upgrade outdated

2020-09-23 Thread Christopher Jones
Hi, The error Error: Failed to activate libgcc10: Image error: /opt/local/lib/libgcc/libatomic.1.dylib is being used by the active libgcc port. Please deactivate this port first, or use 'port -f activate tells me its really been a very very long time since the ports where last updated

Re: Failure to upgrade outdated

2020-09-23 Thread Ruben Di Battista
Did you already tried to do what it suggest? ``` Please deactivate this port first, or use 'port -f activate libgcc10' to force the activation. ``` So deactivate the libgcc port and run the upgrade again? On Wed, 23 Sep 2020, 12:43 list_email--- via macports-users, <

Failure to upgrade outdated

2020-09-23 Thread list_email--- via macports-users
I had not changed anything in my Macports installation for a long time. Then I got to messing around with AquaTerm and something in the linking stage kept crashing, so naturally I decided to freshen up my MacPorts set-up. Here’s what happened. I have no idea what to do. macOS 10.11.6 Thanks

Re: Apple ARM binary codesign issue

2020-09-23 Thread Ruben Di Battista
Can't be an easier choice to push globally a linker switch, if it exists, to disable codesigning altogether for MP software? On Wed, 23 Sep 2020, 03:09 Saagar Jha, wrote: > As far as I understand, ad-hoc codesigning is not actually really meant to > protect a file on disk because you can just