Requested munt-mt32emu port file

Hi all, yesterday I requested a port of Munt’s mt32emu library (munt.sourceforge.net ) at https://trac.macports.org/ticket/62166 and just added a working portfile https://trac.macports.org/attachment/ticket/62166/Portfile

Re: Using X11 for an older program

Hi, download and install xquartz from https://www.xquartz.org . This is the semi-official X11.app replacement. Did not get an update for four years now but it brings the needed libraries and installs in /opt/x11. Good luck! :) Dominik > On 22. Dec 2020, at 08:50,

Re: local *single* Portfile

> On 7. Dec 2020, at 17:54, Kevin Reid wrote: > > On Mon, Dec 7, 2020 at 3:10 AM Dominik Reichardt <mailto:domi...@gmail.com>> wrote: > I need to test whether a patch for cairo helps for a severe crash bug when > you build against it with macOS SDK 11.0. > (see htt

local *single* Portfile

Hi all, I need to test whether a patch for cairo helps for a severe crash bug when you build against it with macOS SDK 11.0. (see https://gitlab.freedesktop.org/cairo/cairo/-/issues/420 and the pull request !52

Re: macOS 11 Big Sur and MacPorts

> On 16. Nov 2020, at 10:05, Wahlstedt Jyrki wrote: > > > >> Dominik Reichardt mailto:domi...@gmail.com>> kirjoitti >> 16.11.2020 kello 10.55: >> >> In Xcode itself I actually do not see the CLT listed at all, only the >> s

Re: suddenly, "-arch i386" is added and all fails: e.g. libsdl (dosbox is i386 only)

> On 7. Mar 2020, at 18:30, Ken Cunningham > wrote: > >> As I was one of those with in depth view on DOSBox and previously adamant on >> leaving it on i386: >> >> - the best 64bit support, meaning the fastest, is in current SVN of DOSBox. >> The 0.74-3 release is ok but very slow. >> >>

Re: suddenly, "-arch i386" is added and all fails: e.g. libsdl (dosbox is i386 only)

As I was one of those with in depth view on DOSBox and previously adamant on leaving it on i386: - the best 64bit support, meaning the fastest, is in current SVN of DOSBox. The 0.74-3 release is ok but very slow. - IMHO, do NOT use the fork of DOSBox for SDL2 unless that particular branch is

Re: dosbox update?

ators that work better 32bit. > > Ken > > > > > On 2018-10-04, at 1:55 AM, Dominik Reichardt wrote: > >> The developers of DOSBox know that it needs to improve but it’s not an easy >> task. And yes, you are right for most things the 64bit performance is

Re: dosbox update?

in time. But I imagine it's > still faster than the ancient systems it emulates, so aside from power usage > e.g. on a laptop, presumably it's still usable for most purposes, if not > ideal. > >> On Oct 4, 2018, at 03:36, Dominik Reichardt > <mailto:domi...@gmail.com>> w

Re: dosbox update?

JFYI, while the 64bit DOSBox now builds and runs correctly, the performance penalty is still enormous. DOSBox built in 64bit is running at roughly 55% of a 32bit build. Dom > On 4. Oct 2018, at 02:39, Ken Cunningham > wrote: > > I have the update done and I'm using it now. > > Just working

Re: User information about macOS Mojave

Am 28.09.2018 um 18:50 schrieb Thomas Bodlien : >> >> Well, on second thought, if you want to generate 32bit executables with the >> newest compilers, it should be possible to build LLVM 7.0 and use it with >> the MacOS 10.13 SDK. So, no need to be limited to older compiler versions. >> And

Re: User information about macOS Mojave

At least for command line building of things this will be a way to keep old xxode around. > Am 27.09.2018 um 12:08 schrieb Ces VLC : > > > > On Thu, Sep 27, 2018 at 12:01 PM Richard L. Hamilton > wrote: > > > > Clearly you can install 9.4.1 on Mojave...and it seems to work at least for > >

Re: anything that only builds 32-bit?

Notable 32bit only is DOSBox. It builds in 64bit but performance drops by 90% > Am 07.01.2018 um 04:56 schrieb Richard L. Hamilton : > > Given that 32-bit support may be reduced by future OS versions, it would be > good to know what ports or variants only build 32-bit. > >

Re: High Sierra and MacPorts

I don't know what went wrong but I didn't see the announcement here in the user list, nor the announcement for the previous release. And at least for 2.4.2 neither did the list archive https://lists.macports.org/pipermail/macports-users/2017-October/date.html > Am 12.10.2017 um 10:28 schrieb

Re: Retro -- Tiger/Leopard PPC - libsdl2 infrastructure now available

Thanks, I'm offering snapshots for some SDL based stuff and if possible I still offer a universal build with ppc support. Having SDL2 is great. What's the holdup with SDL2? Upstream is about to release a new version any day now and that will be 2.0.6. Thanks Dom > Am 06.07.2017 um 09:38

Re: A question on dynamic linking / version-changing libraries

easons MP does not have anything like frameworks is simply because such > an idea does not really exist in the Linux/OSS world and as MP is essentially > just a packaging system for that, thats what we get. Theoretically, could > such a system exist there ? yes, of course. Will it

Re: A question on dynamic linking / version-changing libraries

Oh you can build stuff statically but that is a kind of manual work and not for MP to do. > On 5. Mar 2017, at 19:47, Michael wrote: > > >> On 2017-03-05, at 9:49 AM, Brandon Allbery wrote: >> Also fixed-*path* libraries are part of the Mach-O format