On Tue, 7 Mar 2017, Brandon Allbery wrote:
> DNS uses udp (and some tcp). I'd be really surprised if it blocked
> /all/ udp packets (and if so, I would get my provider to replace
> it or let me replace it with something that didn't suck).
>
> Usuually this is trying to force y
> On Mar 8, 2017, at 10:20, Dave Horsfall wrote:
>
> the Mac pretends to be Unix, but Unix it ain't.
Since words do still have meanings, I have to point out that macOS is a
certified POSIX-compliant UNIX OS.
https://www.opengroup.org/openbrand/register/apple.htm
On Mon, 6 Mar 2017, Ryan Schmidt wrote:
> > Hmmm... Still busted here (Australia) so it's either regional or
> > local.
>
> In Australia you should be using your local Australian mirror (aarnet)
> anyway for better performance:
>
> https://trac.macports.org/wiki/Mirrors
Done... As I've said
On Tue, Mar 7, 2017 at 10:59 AM, Daniel J. Luke wrote:
> DNS uses udp (and some tcp). I'd be really surprised if it blocked /all/
> udp packets (and if so, I would get my provider to replace it or let me
> replace it with something that didn't suck).
Usuually this is trying to force you to use
On Tue, 7 Mar 2017, Daniel J. Luke wrote:
> DNS uses udp (and some tcp). I'd be really surprised if it blocked /all/
> udp packets (and if so, I would get my provider to replace it or let me
> replace it with something that didn't suck).
To clarify: DNS works OK, but nothing else on UDP does.
On Mar 7, 2017, at 10:55 AM, Dave Horsfall wrote:
> On Tue, 7 Mar 2017, Dave Horsfall wrote:
> A posting on an unrelated subject reminded me about something: I recently
> upgraded my broadband service from ADSL (copper) to fibre, and a new
> router was supplied. I've since discovered that the r
On Tue, 7 Mar 2017, Dave Horsfall wrote:
> Thanks; that nails it to my back yard, then :-(
A posting on an unrelated subject reminded me about something: I recently
upgraded my broadband service from ADSL (copper) to fibre, and a new
router was supplied. I've since discovered that the router (
> On 7 Mar 2017, at 14:32, Ryan Schmidt wrote:
>
>
> On Mar 6, 2017, at 17:07, Dave Horsfall wrote:
>
>> Hmmm... Still busted here (Australia) so it's either regional or local.
>
> In Australia you should be using your local Australian mirror (aarnet) anyway
> for better performance:
>
> h
On Mar 6, 2017, at 17:07, Dave Horsfall wrote:
> Hmmm... Still busted here (Australia) so it's either regional or local.
In Australia you should be using your local Australian mirror (aarnet) anyway
for better performance:
https://trac.macports.org/wiki/Mirrors
On 07/03/2017, at 10:07 AM, Dave Horsfall wrote:
> On Mon, 6 Mar 2017, Daniel J. Luke wrote:
>> it's working for me right now.
>
> Hmmm... Still busted here (Australia) so it's either regional or local.
>
> Any other Aussies on the list?
Seems to be working for me --- in Melbourne.
Ian W.
Tara
On Tue, 7 Mar 2017, Peter West wrote:
> Just did a selfupdate. 9:30am AEST.
Thanks; that nails it to my back yard, then :-(
--
Dave Horsfall DTM (VK2KFU) "Those who don't understand security will suffer."
On Mon, 6 Mar 2017, Daniel J. Luke wrote:
> it's working for me right now.
Hmmm... Still busted here (Australia) so it's either regional or local.
Any other Aussies on the list?
--
Dave Horsfall DTM (VK2KFU) "Those who don't understand security will suffer."
On Mar 6, 2017, at 4:08 PM, Dave Horsfall wrote:
> ozzie:~ [16]# port -v selfupdate
> ---> Updating MacPorts base sources using rsync
> rsync: failed to connect to rsync.macports.org: Operation timed out (60)
> rsync error: error in socket IO (code 10) at
> /BuildRoot/Library/Caches/com.apple
ozzie:~ [16]# port -v selfupdate
---> Updating MacPorts base sources using rsync
rsync: failed to connect to rsync.macports.org: Operation timed out (60)
rsync error: error in socket IO (code 10) at
/BuildRoot/Library/Caches/com.apple.xbs/Sources/rsync/rsync-51/rsync/clientserver.c(106)
[rece
14 matches
Mail list logo
