On 2017-2-1 03:33 , William H. Magill wrote:
I just updated my two systems - an iMac and aMmac mini. The iMac when cleanly,
but the Mac mini “hick-upped”.
I thought the mini was on the immediately previous release. I guess not.
Not a big deal. just interesting.
shianbrae> sudo port selfupdat
I just updated my two systems - an iMac and aMmac mini. The iMac when cleanly,
but the Mac mini “hick-upped”.
I thought the mini was on the immediately previous release. I guess not.
Not a big deal. just interesting.
shianbrae> sudo port selfupdate
---> Updating MacPorts base sources using r
> On Jan 27, 2017, at 5:06 PM, Clemens Lang wrote:
>
> Hi,
>
> On Fri, Jan 27, 2017 at 04:28:46PM -0500, Adam Dershowitz wrote:
>> Got it. I was not comfortable running it, without knowing that. Now,
>> I see that it is not at irreversible, without asking first.
>
> That sounds like somet
On 2017-1-28 05:45 , Clemens Lang wrote:
Hi,
On Fri, Jan 27, 2017 at 01:10:57PM -0500, Adam Dershowitz wrote:
I just tried port diagnose and I get the following:
Checking for files installed by ports on disk...
Warning: '/opt/local/libexec/cups/backend/cups-pdf' installed by port
'cups-pdf'
Hi,
On Fri, Jan 27, 2017 at 04:28:46PM -0500, Adam Dershowitz wrote:
> Got it. I was not comfortable running it, without knowing that. Now,
> I see that it is not at irreversible, without asking first.
That sounds like something we should point out in the documentation. The
source of the port
> On Jan 27, 2017, at 4:21 PM, Daniel J. Luke wrote:
>
> On Jan 27, 2017, at 4:05 PM, Adam Dershowitz wrote:
>> I have another question about another new feature.
>> Is there a way to see what port reclaim will do? It says that it doesn’t
>> accept any switches on the Using Macports page. A
On Jan 27, 2017, at 4:05 PM, Adam Dershowitz wrote:
> I have another question about another new feature.
> Is there a way to see what port reclaim will do? It says that it doesn’t
> accept any switches on the Using Macports page. And, it could delete a lot
> of stuff. Something similar to “-y
> On Jan 27, 2017, at 1:45 PM, Clemens Lang wrote:
>
> Hi,
>
> On Fri, Jan 27, 2017 at 01:10:57PM -0500, Adam Dershowitz wrote:
>> I just tried port diagnose and I get the following:
>>
>>
>> Checking for files installed by ports on disk...
>> Warning: '/opt/local/libexec/cups/backend/cups-
> On Jan 27, 2017, at 1:45 PM, Clemens Lang wrote:
>
> Hi,
>
> On Fri, Jan 27, 2017 at 01:10:57PM -0500, Adam Dershowitz wrote:
>> I just tried port diagnose and I get the following:
>>
>>
>> Checking for files installed by ports on disk...
>> Warning: '/opt/local/libexec/cups/backend/cups-
Hi,
On Fri, Jan 27, 2017 at 01:10:57PM -0500, Adam Dershowitz wrote:
> I just tried port diagnose and I get the following:
>
>
> Checking for files installed by ports on disk...
> Warning: '/opt/local/libexec/cups/backend/cups-pdf' installed by port
> 'cups-pdf' is currently not readable. Plea
Nice work on the new version. Thanks.
I just tried port diagnose and I get the following:
Checking for files installed by ports on disk...
Warning: '/opt/local/libexec/cups/backend/cups-pdf' installed by port
'cups-pdf' is currently not readable. Please try again. If this problem
persists, p
Nice work on the new version. Thanks.
I just tried port diagnose and I get the following:
Checking for files installed by ports on disk...
Warning: '/opt/local/libexec/cups/backend/cups-pdf' installed by port
'cups-pdf' is currently not readable. Please try again. If this problem
persists, p
On Fri, Jan 27, 2017 at 8:23 AM, Joshua Root wrote:
> the 2.4.0 version has now
>
> been released…
>
Thank you very much.
--
Eneko Gotzon Ares
enekogot...@gmail.com
The MacPorts Project is happy to announce that the 2.4.0 version has now
been released. It is available via the usual methods:
- selfupdate if you already have MacPorts installed
- package installers for 10.12 [1], 10.11 [2], 10.10 [3], 10.9 [4],
10.8 [5], 10.7 [6], 10.6 [7] and 10.5 [8] (un
14 matches
Mail list logo
