Re: Migration issue

> On Jan 13, 2017, at 10:58 AM, Daniel J. Luke wrote: > >> So, this suggests that there might be some combination of the long list of >> ports below that I could uninstall +universal, then install default, and >> that might allow wine to build? > > well, I was suggesting that you can even '

Re: Migration issue

> So, this suggests that there might be some combination of the long list of > ports below that I could uninstall +universal, then install default, and that > might allow wine to build? well, I was suggesting that you can even 'uninstall' any 'build' dependencies after they've been used to bui

Re: Migration issue

> On Jan 13, 2017, at 9:56 AM, Daniel J. Luke wrote: > > On Jan 13, 2017, at 9:50 AM, Adam Dershowitz wrote: >>> The dependency engine in MacPorts doesn't really handle variants, so I >>> always expect everything that does magic with variants to have problems >>> like this (the difference in

Re: Migration issue

On Jan 13, 2017, at 9:50 AM, Adam Dershowitz wrote: >> The dependency engine in MacPorts doesn't really handle variants, so I >> always expect everything that does magic with variants to have problems like >> this (the difference in +universal ports probably just depends on the order >> that th

Re: Migration issue

> On Jan 13, 2017, at 9:45 AM, Daniel J. Luke wrote: > > On Jan 13, 2017, at 8:26 AM, Adam Dershowitz wrote: >> I uninstalled all ports, and then tried to just install my requested ports, >> with variants, that I wanted. Almost all were just default and none of >> these were +universal. Bu

Re: Migration issue

On Jan 13, 2017, at 8:26 AM, Adam Dershowitz wrote: > I uninstalled all ports, and then tried to just install my requested ports, > with variants, that I wanted. Almost all were just default and none of these > were +universal. But, when it got to install wine-devel, it proceeded to > install

Re: Migration issue

> On Jan 12, 2017, at 4:41 PM, Daniel J. Luke wrote: > > On Jan 12, 2017, at 4:08 PM, Adam Dershowitz wrote: >> But, if there are actually any ports that I have where +universal is the >> default, and is necessary, that would break them, and their chain of >> dependancies. I don’t know if t

Re: Migration issue

On Jan 12, 2017, at 4:08 PM, Adam Dershowitz wrote: > But, if there are actually any ports that I have where +universal is the > default, and is necessary, that would break them, and their chain of > dependancies. I don’t know if there are any like that, or how I can tell, > except by manually

Re: Migration issue

But, if there are actually any ports that I have where +universal is the default, and is necessary, that would break them, and their chain of dependancies. I don’t know if there are any like that, or how I can tell, except by manually reviewing info for each one. Is there any other way? --Ada

Re: Migration issue

On 11/01/17 18:04, Adam Dershowitz wrote: On Jan 11, 2017, at 10:05 AM, Russell Jones > wrote: On 06/01/17 17:37, Adam Dershowitz wrote: On Jan 6, 2017, at 9:49 AM, Russell Jones wrote: On 06/01/17 14:28, Adam Dershowitz wrote: > On Jan 6,

Re: Migration issue

> On Jan 11, 2017, at 10:05 AM, Russell Jones > wrote: > > > > On 06/01/17 17:37, Adam Dershowitz wrote: >> >> >>> On Jan 6, 2017, at 9:49 AM, Russell Jones < >>> russell.jo...@physics.ox.ac.uk >>> > wrote: >>>

Re: Migration issue

On 06/01/17 17:37, Adam Dershowitz wrote: On Jan 6, 2017, at 9:49 AM, Russell Jones > wrote: On 06/01/17 14:28, Adam Dershowitz wrote: > On Jan 6, 2017, at 9:04 AM, Russell Jones wrote: > > On 06/01/17 13:22, Adam Dershowitz wrote: >> On Jan 6,

Re: Migration issue

On Fri, Jan 6, 2017 at 12:37 PM, Adam Dershowitz wrote: > But, this list is from the old machine. My question is why the new > machine ended up with a lot more +universal. Actually, I'm starting to wonder if there is a general option leakage issue of late (compare the discussion about archive_

Re: Migration issue

> On Jan 6, 2017, at 9:49 AM, Russell Jones > wrote: > > On 06/01/17 14:28, Adam Dershowitz wrote: >> >> >> > On Jan 6, 2017, at 9:04 AM, Russell Jones >> > wrote: >> > >> > On 06/01/17 13:22, Adam Dershowitz wrote: >> >> On Jan 6, 2017, at 2:20 AM,

Re: Migration issue

On 06/01/17 14:28, Adam Dershowitz wrote: > On Jan 6, 2017, at 9:04 AM, Russell Jones wrote: > > On 06/01/17 13:22, Adam Dershowitz wrote: >> On Jan 6, 2017, at 2:20 AM, Ryan Schmidt wrote: >>> On Jan 5, 2017, at 09:26, Adam Dershowitz wrote: I just tried what you suggested for py27-

Re: Migration issue

On 06/01/17 13:22, Adam Dershowitz wrote: On Jan 6, 2017, at 2:20 AM, Ryan Schmidt wrote: On Jan 5, 2017, at 09:26, Adam Dershowitz wrote: I just tried what you suggested for py27-numpy and it just activated without any error. Yes, there will not be an error at activation time. However, if y

Re: Migration issue

> On Jan 6, 2017, at 2:20 AM, Ryan Schmidt wrote: > > >> On Jan 5, 2017, at 09:26, Adam Dershowitz wrote: >> >> I just tried what you suggested for py27-numpy and it just activated without >> any error. > > Yes, there will not be an error at activation time. However, if you have > anythi

Re: Migration issue

> On Jan 5, 2017, at 09:26, Adam Dershowitz wrote: > > I just tried what you suggested for py27-numpy and it just activated without > any error. Yes, there will not be an error at activation time. However, if you have anything installed that required py27-numpy to be universal, it will now b

Re: Migration issue

I just tried what you suggested for py27-numpy and it just activated without any error. So, myports.txt has py27-numpy @1.11.3_0+gfortran (active) platform='darwin 15' archs='x86_64' And, after the migration it had installed both that and the +universal variant. Yet, when I tried to activ

Re: Migration issue

You could try activating the non +universal version to get a dependency error. Then do the same for the dependency, and so on back to the first port built +universal. Russell On 05/01/17 14:56, Adam Dershowitz wrote: On Jan 5, 2017, at 9:44 AM, Rainer Müller > w

Re: Migration issue

> On Jan 5, 2017, at 9:44 AM, Rainer Müller wrote: > > On 2017-01-05 14:51, Adam Dershowitz wrote: >> >> >>> On Jan 4, 2017, at 10:02 PM, Ryan Schmidt wrote: >>> >>> On Jan 4, 2017, at 07:52, Adam Dershowitz wrote: >>> So, yes it seems that the on the new machine I ended up with gcc6

Re: Migration issue

On 2017-01-05 14:51, Adam Dershowitz wrote: > > >> On Jan 4, 2017, at 10:02 PM, Ryan Schmidt wrote: >> >> On Jan 4, 2017, at 07:52, Adam Dershowitz wrote: >> >>> So, yes it seems that the on the new machine I ended up with gcc6 being >>> universal, so then cctools, ld64-latest, llvm-3.9 etc are

Re: Migration issue

> On Jan 4, 2017, at 10:02 PM, Ryan Schmidt wrote: > > On Jan 4, 2017, at 07:52, Adam Dershowitz wrote: > >> So, yes it seems that the on the new machine I ended up with gcc6 being >> universal, so then cctools, ld64-latest, llvm-3.9 etc are all universal. >> But, the strange thing is that

Re: Migration issue

On Jan 4, 2017, at 07:52, Adam Dershowitz wrote: > So, yes it seems that the on the new machine I ended up with gcc6 being > universal, so then cctools, ld64-latest, llvm-3.9 etc are all universal. > But, the strange thing is that gcc6 has no dependents, and I didn’t > explicitly install it.

Re: Migration issue

> On Jan 3, 2017, at 8:13 PM, Adam Dershowitz wrote: > > Yes, xar. > That port actually got fixed quickly, so the specific problem is gone. > But, the situation still has me curious. Why should just moving myports.txt > end up with a bunch more universal ports on the new machine? Is it a >

Re: Migration issue

Yes, xar. That port actually got fixed quickly, so the specific problem is gone. But, the situation still has me curious. Why should just moving myports.txt end up with a bunch more universal ports on the new machine? Is it a difference between 10.11 and 10.12? On January 3, 2017 7:35:00 PM E

Re: Migration issue

> On Jan 2, 2017, at 14:12, Adam Dershowitz wrote: > > I am trying to get an existing set of ports into a new machine. > I ended up wiping /opt/local on the new machine, so I'm just using the > migration script and myports.txt. So it is a fresh macports install. > My problem seems to be that I

Migration issue

I am trying to get an existing set of ports into a new machine. I ended up wiping /opt/local on the new machine, so I'm just using the migration script and myports.txt. So it is a fresh macports install. My problem seems to be that I had Xer installed on the old machine (2012 MacBook pro with OS