#134: require 'rexml/document' fails
+---
Reporter: [EMAIL PROTECTED] |Owner: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Type: defect | Status: new
Priority: major |Mil
At 13:36 -0500 11/12/08, Benjamin Stiglitz wrote:
> I should say that the RubySpec effort is also useful for
> testing MacRuby, in as much as it provides coverage for
> the vast majority of the behavior which MacRuby shares
> with 1.9 ...
My understanding is that the 1.9 coverage in the RubySpec
s
PS: Credits to Laurent who has been making an effort on writing more
and more tests for
the core part of MacRuby! :)
Ditto. I should say that the RubySpec effort is also useful for
testing MacRuby, in as much as it provides coverage for the vast
majority of the behavior which MacRuby share
Hi Rich,
That seems like a sensible list to me.
Thanks for the info!
- Eloy
On Nov 12, 2008, at 4:10 PM, Richard Kilmer wrote:
On Nov 12, 2008, at 9:16 AM, Richard Kilmer wrote:
All,
As the main author of HotCocoa let me chime in on what I see its
main purpose is.
In a nutshell here i
On Nov 12, 2008, at 4:31 PM, Matt Aimonetti wrote:
One thing the "cowboys", from Rails for instance, have done right
is that there are tests for almost everything,
which is something that is seriously lacking atm imo.
Rails testing suite is in a very sad state,
Definitely not going to argue
At 10:50 +0100 11/12/08, Eloy Duran wrote:
> One thing the "cowboys", from Rails for instance, have done right
> is that there are tests for almost everything, which is something
> that is seriously lacking atm imo.
Definitely. I had intended to mention testing, but it got lost. I
can't find muc
>
> One thing the "cowboys", from Rails for instance, have done right
> is that there are tests for almost everything,
> which is something that is seriously lacking atm imo.
>
Rails testing suite is in a very sad state, however I do agree with you, and
I'll go further, we also need a test harness
not sure why I did it like that, I read it somewhere and then I was lazy and
didn't bother looking further :(
-Matt
On Wed, Nov 12, 2008 at 4:10 AM, Markus Prinz <[EMAIL PROTECTED]
> wrote:
>
> On 12.11.2008, at 07:26, Matt Aimonetti wrote:
>
> yay! I finally got it to build. Turns out that I s
On Nov 12, 2008, at 9:16 AM, Richard Kilmer wrote:
All,
As the main author of HotCocoa let me chime in on what I see its
main purpose is.
In a nutshell here is my 5 second primary definition:
"HotCocoa is an idiomatic Ruby API that simplifies the configuration
and wiring together of com
All,
As the main author of HotCocoa let me chime in on what I see its main
purpose is.
In a nutshell here is my 5 second primary definition:
"HotCocoa is an idiomatic Ruby API that simplifies the configuration
and wiring together of complex ObjC/Cocoa classes."
I realize this will not be
The result we're looking for (IMHO) is a way to write Cocoa apps
that "look right" to Ruby programmers. The number of Objective-C
programmers who don't work on OSX apps is vanishingly small.
By opening up OSX programming to MacBook-carrying Rubyists, Apple
can grow its developer base in relative
* Focus on design and engineering
In an age of "cowboy programming", I find it refreshing to
see that some programming projects actually embrace design
and engineering.
One thing the “cowboys”, from Rails for instance, have done right
is that there are tests for almost everything,
which i
On 12.11.2008, at 07:26, Matt Aimonetti wrote:
yay! I finally got it to build. Turns out that I still had the old
miniruby
which wasn't built properly. After cleaning up everything, restored
MacOsX
ruby and re tried, everything works fine :)
By the way, was there any reason why you remove
13 matches
Mail list logo
