uming that what is left out is anything that warrants a
"require" statement?
Again, Thanks!
Anthony
On 4 February 2010 01:36, Anthony Buck wrote:
> Hi all,
> I have a couple of questions which I have attempted to answer to
> no-avail. I was wondering if anyone could poin
said application without the "standard library." am I right
in thinking that this is the ruby standard library which was left
unpackaged? Wouldn't this render the application un-runnable?
Any advice on any of the 3 questions is much appreciated.
Regards,
Anthony Buck
* http://isa
