Hey David,
Francis is right, MRI is leading the way, although there was an ISO standard
released last year.
The alternative implementations started the ruby specs, years before that so
they could get their rubies to work as drop in replacement for MRI.
There are other languages with variants th
I get the feeling few of you are every day ruby developers, there are
incompatibilities between all ruby versions, yes even between 1.9 and 1.8 so
why on earth should macruby be a finnished Sofa, snug and compfy. It is part of
rubys attraction that it still evolves.
If I want write a web applic
if you don't have fun, you are doing it wrong.
On 20 Dec 2011, at 17:06, Dan Farrand wrote:
> I would like to probe sentiment around the future for MacRuby ? is there a
> future ? I am drawn to it - I like Ruby as a language and development
> approach. I appreciate the entrance it provides
Ios== iphone &ipad
Reasons are the missing garbage collector for now
Cheers
ben
On 2 Jan 2011, at 21:55, Henry Maddocks wrote:
>
>
> Sent from my iPad
>
> On 3/01/2011, at 5:03 AM, Thibault Martin-Lagardette
> wrote:
>
>> However, please be aware that as of today, it is not possible to su
Hi,
I think I have the same problem:
$ macirb
irb(main):001:0> require 'bio'
=> true
irb(main):002:0> Bio::RestrictionEnzyme::SingleStrand.superclass
*=> #>*
irb(main):006:0> >>
Bio::RestrictionEnzyme::SingleStrand.class_eval('superclass')
*SyntaxError: compile error
(irb):6: syntax error, unexpe
