Hi,
On Jul 1, 2009, at 8:23 AM, Jjgod Jiang wrote:
Hi all,
On Wed, Jul 1, 2009 at 9:26 PM, zhida cheng wrote:
But in this very simple (I think) script, Macruby is 10x slower than
built-in Ruby in OSX 10.5.7
It's for reading atom positions, calculating distances, make a
summary and
find out
Hi all,
On Wed, Jul 1, 2009 at 9:26 PM, zhida cheng wrote:
> But in this very simple (I think) script, Macruby is 10x slower than
> built-in Ruby in OSX 10.5.7
> It's for reading atom positions, calculating distances, make a summary and
> find out nearest atoms.
> You can get the codes here: http:
Hi all,
I'm using ruby for some simple scripts for data processing,
and I'm interested in Macruby since it's a mac friendly framework and
very snappy too.
But in this very simple (I think) script, Macruby is 10x slower than
built-in Ruby in OSX 10.5.7
It's for reading atom positions, calcul
