Done, with some benchmarks: http://www.macruby.org/trac/ticket/1204
Mark Rada
[email protected]
On 2011-03-23, at 5:20 PM, Laurent Sansonetti wrote:
> Hi Mark,
>
> Sorry for the late reply.
>
> Could you file at ticket and add a link to the changes on github? I will look
> into this on
Hi Mark,
Sorry for the late reply.
Could you file at ticket and add a link to the changes on github? I will look
into this once we release 0.10.
Thanks!
Laurent
On Mar 14, 2011, at 6:58 PM, Mark Rada wrote:
> On 2011-03-14, at 16:05, Laurent Sansonetti wrote:
>
>> Hi Mark,
>>
>> As macruby
On 2011-03-14, at 16:05, Laurent Sansonetti wrote:
> Hi Mark,
>
> As macrubyc's compilation logic is essentially spawning several command-line
> tools, I wonder if calling the logic directly from macruby_deploy is going to
> bring significant advantages, vs the complexity of splitting macrubyc
Hi Mark,
As macrubyc's compilation logic is essentially spawning several command-line
tools, I wonder if calling the logic directly from macruby_deploy is going to
bring significant advantages, vs the complexity of splitting macrubyc.
I think a better strategy would be to optimize what's slow i
Hi,
I have completed a proof of concept patch for MacRuby where I have split the UI
of macrubyc from the underlying logic so that tools like macruby_deploy can
make use of the compiler without having to spawn a new macruby process for each
file that needs to be compiled. This should also be ben
