Hey Laurent,
Fair enough, point taken :)
Eloy
On 19 aug 2009, at 00:20, Laurent Sansonetti wrote:
Hi Eloy,
I would also love to have a ffi-based zlib but we need zlib urgently
for RubyGems and I don't think our FFI implementation will be ready
soon. It is still our objective to finish FF
Hi Eloy,
I would also love to have a ffi-based zlib but we need zlib urgently
for RubyGems and I don't think our FFI implementation will be ready
soon. It is still our objective to finish FFI and maybe we can quickly
rewrite the extension in pure Ruby for the release. The current
extensio
Great, good luck Patrick!
- Matt
On Tue, Aug 18, 2009 at 2:52 PM, Patrick Thomson wrote:
> Hi everyone,
>
> I'm working on porting ext/zlib to MacRuby right now. I took a look at
> zliby - though it's certainly nice to have a zlib implementation in pure
> Ruby, zliby seems to be kind of dead in
Hey Patrick,
How about the getting the ffi zlib implementation to work? Seems to me
that it would kill two birds with one stone, i.e. getting FFI in a
more usable state and a C backed zlib implementation.
Eloy
On 18 aug 2009, at 23:52, Patrick Thomson wrote:
Hi everyone,
I'm working on
Hi everyone,
I'm working on porting ext/zlib to MacRuby right now. I took a look at
zliby - though it's certainly nice to have a zlib implementation in pure
Ruby, zliby seems to be kind of dead in the water (according to its
RubyForge page, it hasn't been updated in almost a year).
Additionall
