#22: NSPredicate doesn't work
-+--
Reporter: jordan.breed...@…|Owner: lsansone...@…
Type: defect | Status: closed
Priority: blocker |
Very nice. Congrats!
Carlos Paramio
El 28/03/2009, a las 4:12, Laurent Sansonetti escribió:
Hi guys,
I'm glad to introduce you our new website!
http://macruby.org
It's written with webby and it's very easy to maintain it. It was
implemented so that people can easily contribute changes.
Hi guys,
As some of you already noticed we have been working on a branch for a
few weeks and I thought it's now time to describe what has been done
and were we are going exactly.
I wrote a blog entry here:
http://www.macruby.org/blog/2009/03/28/experimental-branch.html
2 big features in t
Will OSA support be a 0.5 or a 0.6 task?
On Mar 28, 2009, at 14:37, Laurent Sansonetti
wrote:
Hi guys,
As some of you already noticed we have been working on a branch for
a few weeks and I thought it's now time to describe what has been
done and were we are going exactly.
I wrote a b
Most likely 0.6, unless someone volunteers to do it now :-)
Laurent
On Mar 28, 2009, at 12:48 PM, Jordan Breeding wrote:
Will OSA support be a 0.5 or a 0.6 task?
On Mar 28, 2009, at 14:37, Laurent Sansonetti
wrote:
Hi guys,
As some of you already noticed we have been working on a branc
Well if you offer guidance and the target for 0.5 really is just "this
year" then I might be able to give it a shot and help out.
Of course that also depends on whether I get a job immediately after
graduation in August and how busy that keeps me.
On Mar 28, 2009, at 14:56, Laurent Sansonet
This is awesome new Laurent!
You have done amazing work to get this far and I know you will get it
all the way.
Also Eloy and Vincent helped a lot with both the VM and specs and
tests. Thanks to all of you!
Do you have any plans for enlisting specific support you need to move
things al
#238: rdoc memleaks & segfaults when installing gems
+---
Reporter: t...@… | Owner: lsansone...@…
Type: defect | Status: new
Priority: critical
Hello,
banchmark is already impressive when compared to 0.4.
I ran the benchmark with:
1. clang -03 -arch i386 macruby 0.4
2. clang -O3 -arch i386 macruby 0.5
3. gcc-4.2 -O3 -arch i386 macruby 0.5
(clang is the C/ObjC compiler native to LLVM)
PS. clang currently doesn’t pass rake spec:ci (
==
Hello,
I'm curious, how did you manage to build MacRuby with clang? I thought
it did not support C++ yet. Did you use llvm-g++ maybe?
Laurent
On Mar 28, 2009, at 4:45 PM, रजनीश wrote:
Hello,
banchmark is already impressive when compared to 0.4.
I ran the benchmark with:
1. clang -03 -arc
Laurent Sansonetti wrote:
Hi guys,
As some of you already noticed we have been working on a branch for a
few weeks and I thought it's now time to describe what has been done and
were we are going exactly.
Very cool stuff...some low-level benchmarks seem to have really
excellent performance.
Hi Charles,
On Mar 28, 2009, at 9:46 PM, Charles Oliver Nutter wrote:
Laurent Sansonetti wrote:
Hi guys,
As some of you already noticed we have been working on a branch for
a few weeks and I thought it's now time to describe what has been
done and were we are going exactly.
Very cool stu
Laurent Sansonetti wrote:
It's possible by modifying the source code and comment the call to
createInstructionCombiningPass() and createCFGSimplificationPass(), but
I do not recommend to remove these because I think it would break the
way we compile Dwarf exception handlers in blocks.
# In my
13 matches
Mail list logo
