Good to know :)
Hate to ask since I can never answer this question myself: do you have
a loose timeline for the release ?
-Dylan
On Oct 2, 2009, at 1:54 AM, Laurent Sansonetti
wrote:
Hi Dylan,
The AOT compilation of an Xcode project is still not finalized. It's
technically pos
In the Xcode project select 'Unit Tests' from as the active target
from tge tool bar. Then build :)
-Dylan
On Oct 2, 2009, at 2:25 AM, John-Paul Bader wrote:
Hey,
how exactly can I run these tests? rake test would be great.
kind regards,
John
On 02.10.2009, at 08:35, Dyla
y patches if this seems like a good route to go.
- Dylan Bruzenak
www.ideaswarm.com
___
MacRuby-devel mailing list
[email protected]
http://lists.macosforge.org/mailman/listinfo.cgi/macruby-devel
Message is being held pending moderator approval; let me know if I should
post the actual file somewhere else :)
- Dylan
On Thu, Oct 1, 2009 at 9:48 PM, Dylan Bruzenak wrote:
> Good idea. I've attached it here. I may have accidentally added the build
> directory as well; this should
bsite if that is preferred.
- Dylan
On Thu, Oct 1, 2009 at 11:07 PM, Laurent Sansonetti
wrote:
> Hi Dylan,
>
> Could you open a trac ticket and attach your new template there? It would
> be a better idea I guess, and we can also track its inclusion to trunk from
> there.
>
&g
How very self-referential; I love it :)
I'll have a look. Maybe wait until my fever goes away before I take a stab
at prose though.
- Dylan
On Fri, Oct 2, 2009 at 1:26 AM, Laurent Sansonetti wrote:
> Hi Dylan,
>
> Ideally it would be awesome to have some documentation on the websi
this far enough along to consider adding to the project templates
by default ?
thanks!
- Dylan
___
MacRuby-devel mailing list
[email protected]
http://lists.macosforge.org/mailman/listinfo.cgi/macruby-devel
it out), replicating the effort and
running into a disheartening wall anyway. Or worse, they could choose not to
go beyond initial experiments with MacRuby due to the lack of apparent
support for testing. So either way, the current state of testing should
probably be addressed somewhere with a call
cited about it and have a bajillion questions,
concerns, and little bumps I hit that I want to smooth out as much as is
feasible. Obviously I won't understand all the barriers yet as I'm learning
and I appreciate the 'well, duh' hand holding in the meantime.
- Dylan
On Fri
ly revolve
around how things should be implemented, the right way, which sounds like
rucola integration.
- Dylan
On Fri, Oct 2, 2009 at 1:30 PM, Dylan Bruzenak wrote:
> I'm trying not to jump to conclusions, just feeling out the space and
> trying to open up the discussion a bit. Not
nyone who chooses
'show package contents' :)
- Dylan
On Fri, Oct 2, 2009 at 1:49 PM, Laurent Sansonetti wrote:
> 0.5 is scheduled for the end of the year, with a set of beta releases
> before. We didn't set a date in stone yet because we want to ship it when
> it's re
I'll buy maracas and some voodoo/pixie dust then :)
- Dylan
On Fri, Oct 2, 2009 at 2:06 PM, Laurent Sansonetti wrote:
> Hi Dylan,
>
> You can still start your project today and use the JIT during development,
> then once the template is in place, you can activate it. If you ne
ruby_init();
ruby_set_argv(argc, argv);
rb_vm_init_compiler();
try {
void *self = rb_vm_top_self();
//MREP FUNCTION CALLS GO HERE :)
}
catch (...) {
rb_vm_print_current_exception();
rb_exit(1);
}
rb_exit(0);
3.) Am I nuts ? If there's a much easier way to d
Thanks for the detailed response. I'll have to take a stab at one of these
methods, probably the scripting one for starters. nm... things I should have
known yesterday :)
- Dylan
On Fri, Nov 27, 2009 at 2:11 PM, Laurent Sansonetti
wrote:
> Hi Dylan,
>
> Sorry for the late response
library (.dylib) out of Ruby
source files, using the --dylib option. Such a library can later be
linked against an executable that uses the MacRuby runtime. Like
executa-
bles, the Ruby machine code files will *run *upon #require calls.
Otherwise this seems very clear and helpful.
- Dylan
I use defined? MACRUBY_VERSION, myself. A bit shorter ;)
On Fri, Dec 18, 2009 at 3:34 PM, Josh Ballanco wrote:
> Whoops...that's what I get for replying with untested code...
>
>
> On Dec 18, 2009, at 12:14 PM, Paul Howson wrote:
>
> > On 17/12/2009, at 6:21 PM, Josh Ballanco wrote:
> >
> >> def
s out into methods seems to work, but this is a real pain to
track down and the intermittent nature doesn't give me warm fuzzies. Any way
you can check this before 0.6 pushes ? I'm planning on shipping an app soon
to test the waters.
thanks,
- Dylan
On Thu, Apr 29, 2010 at 5:02 PM, Laur
17 matches
Mail list logo
