Dude! You totally didn't ignore it!
Sent from my iPhone
On Feb 28, 2009, at 10:45 AM, Timothy McDowell
wrote:
Well, we got it! =D
On Sat, Feb 28, 2009 at 10:43 AM, Julien Jassaud
wrote:
Sorry, this is just a test message. I have had problems with posting
to the list lately.
Julien
In the comments of Charlie's latest blog post, someone showed their
benchmarks of the 0.5 branch running tak().
http://blog.headius.com/2009/04/how-jruby-makes-ruby-fast.html#comments I'd
like to do the same but rake isn't giving me a macruby executable. How do I
go beyond miniruby and get a ruby c
On Mon, Apr 6, 2009 at 3:16 AM, Eloy Duran wrote:
>
> One last question I have for everyone on the list. If there's someone with
> a 32 bit intel machine, could you please please run the spec:ci task and see
> if you get any failures?
> It seems that, at least, because of a 32/64 bit issue some I
It looks like MacRuby doesn't allow calling return in a block, which works
in 1.8 and 1.9. This looks to be by design, so I'm not sure if the team
wants a ticket created. Should I create a ticket?
def foo
f = Proc.new { return "return from foo from insid
But it is a named exception... Doesn't that mean it is by design? :)
Created #412
On Fri, Oct 30, 2009 at 12:43 AM, Laurent Sansonetti
wrote:
> Hi Mike,
>
> No, this is not by design, you found a bug :-) Please file a ticket.
>
> Thanks,
>
> Laurent
>
>
>
AFAIK, Rails (including ActiveRecord) is not known to work in MacRuby yet.
On Fri, Dec 11, 2009 at 3:14 PM, Mark Buckingham
wrote:
> Hi -
>
> I have macruby 0.5 beta 2 installed, and I'm having trouble with
> activerecord.
>
> First I installed activerecord (and activesupport) via macgem. Macgem
