sking. OK. Birhrhrd! Sorry
>>> about that Mike. I didn't realize.
>>>
>>> Chris.
>>>
>>>
>>> From: macvisionaries@googlegroups.com
>>> [mailto:macvisionaries@googlegroups.com
>>> ] On Behalf Of michael A. Babcock
>>&
sionaries@googlegroups.com
>> [mailto:macvisionar...@googlegroups.com] On Behalf Of michael A.
>> Babcock
>> Sent: Tuesday, September 08, 2009 6:56 PM
>> To: macvisionaries@googlegroups.com
>> Subject: Re: Victor Reader Soft Macintosh
>>
>> no they did not
Haha you *are pretty naive.
We have to remember that RFBD don't just serve the blind, but also
people with other print disabilities.
J
On Sep 8, 2009, at 3:51 PM, Chris Gilland wrote:
> If RFB&D made it, and it's for the blind and disabled, wouldn't that
> naturally probably mean it's access
glegroups.com
> ] On Behalf Of michael A. Babcock
> Sent: Tuesday, September 08, 2009 6:56 PM
> To: macvisionaries@googlegroups.com
> Subject: Re: Victor Reader Soft Macintosh
>
> no they did not make it, it was adapted for the rfbd copy protection
> rfbd uses.
>
> On S
only disability that they
> target,
> or at least their main one anyway, is VI, so Victor should be
> accessible.
>
> Terrence
>> ---- Original Message
>> Subject: Re: Victor Reader Soft Macintosh
>> From: "michael A. Babcock"
>> Date:
isionaries@googlegroups.com
Subject: Re: Victor Reader Soft Macintosh
no they did not make it, it was adapted for the rfbd copy protection rfbd
uses.
On Sep 8, 2009, at 2:51 PM, Chris Gilland wrote:
If RFB&D made it, and it's for the blind and disabled, wouldn't that
naturally proba
If it's Victor, I'm thinking it's probably by Humanware, in which case
it should be accessible. Humanware's only disability that they target,
or at least their main one anyway, is VI, so Victor should be
accessible.
Terrence
> Original Message ----
> Subje
no they did not make it, it was adapted for the rfbd copy protection
rfbd uses.
On Sep 8, 2009, at 2:51 PM, Chris Gilland wrote:
> If RFB&D made it, and it's for the blind and disabled, wouldn't that
> naturally probably mean it's accessible? Maybe I'm very naive but...
>
> Chris.
>
> From:
If RFB&D made it, and it's for the blind and disabled, wouldn't that
naturally probably mean it's accessible? Maybe I'm very naive but...
Chris.
_
From: macvisionaries@googlegroups.com
[mailto:macvisionar...@googlegroups.com] On Behalf Of michael A. Babcock
Sent: Tuesday, September 08
