se characters), you'll get the WAP Review 2009 article about how there were
big improvements to the Washington Post mobile site.
HTH. Cheers,
Esther
On Mar 15, 2011, at 03:09, Howard Dupuis wrote:
> Has anyone had any luck reading anything on The Washington Post's
> newly updated
t to go. The old
WaPo was never the easiest site to navigate; now it's impossible,
inaccessible, a stinkin' nightmare. As Izzy Stone observed, you know
The Washington Post is a great paper because you never know where
you'll find the Page 1 stories. Guess it's even better now, &
