t;>> Good luck.
>>>> On Oct 20, 2010, at 8:20 PM, joe quinn wrote:
>>>>
>>>>> how would this be used? like, i assume it'd be with connected cameras?
>>>>> but how would i benifit form that, oweing to the fact i've got a mini,
&g
with connected cameras? but
>>>> how would i benifit form that, oweing to the fact i've got a mini, with,
>>>> obviously, no camera?
>>>>
>>>> - Original Message - From: "Chris Snyder"
>>>> To:
>>>> Sent: We
luck.
>>> On Oct 20, 2010, at 8:20 PM, joe quinn wrote:
>>>
>>>> how would this be used? like, i assume it'd be with connected cameras? but
>>>> how would i benifit form that, oweing to the fact i've got a mini, with,
>>>> obviously, n
ssage ----- From: "Chris Snyder"
>>> To:
>>> Sent: Wednesday, October 20, 2010 8:43 PM
>>> Subject: Re: facetime for mac is accessible! Yay!
>>>
>>>
>>> If you go to apple.com and search for the term "facetime" you will
;>> On Oct 20, 2010, at 8:20 PM, joe quinn wrote:
>>>
>>>> how would this be used? like, i assume it'd be with connected cameras? but
>>>> how would i benifit form that, oweing to the fact i've got a mini, with,
>>>> obviously, n
uinn wrote:
>>>
>>>> how would this be used? like, i assume it'd be with connected cameras? but
>>>> how would i benifit form that, oweing to the fact i've got a mini, with,
>>>> obviously, no camera?
>>>>
>>>> -
, joe quinn wrote:
>>>>
>>>>> how would this be used? like, i assume it'd be with connected cameras?
>>>>> but how would i benifit form that, oweing to the fact i've got a mini,
>>>>> with, obviously, no camera?
>>>>&g
uld i benifit form that, oweing to the fact i've got a mini, with,
>>>> obviously, no camera?
>>>>
>>>> - Original Message - From: "Chris Snyder"
>>>> To:
>>>> Sent: Wednesday, October 20, 2010 8:43 PM
>>>&
Hi.
I tried it yesterday too, it is easy to use, and in my opinion the sound is
pretty good. It is better than skype often is.
Best regards Annie.
On Oct 21, 2010, at 6:17 AM, Sarah Alawami wrote:
> It kind of is except less complex in my opinion.
> On Oct 20, 2010, at 9:10 PM, Ian McNamara wro
gt;> obviously, no camera?
>>>
>>> - Original Message ----- From: "Chris Snyder"
>>> To:
>>> Sent: Wednesday, October 20, 2010 8:43 PM
>>> Subject: Re: facetime for mac is accessible! Yay!
>>>
>>>
>>> If you g
; - Original Message - From: "Chris Snyder"
>> To:
>> Sent: Wednesday, October 20, 2010 8:43 PM
>> Subject: Re: facetime for mac is accessible! Yay!
>>
>>
>> If you go to apple.com and search for the term "facetime" you will fin
THere are similarities yes. It's more simple and probably better under more
adverse network conditions but the same idea.
On Oct 20, 2010, at 9:10 PM, Ian McNamara wrote:
> so is this sort of like skype then? Ian McNamara.
>
> --
> You received this message because you are subscribed to the
cool may take a look at this app i am hoping to get an ipod touch soon. I would
like an ipad but it's two bulky in my apinyon. I have to say i found it
interesting on the apple hotnews how the ipad seems to be helping autistic
children.
Ian McNamara.
--
You received this message because you
It kind of is except less complex in my opinion.
On Oct 20, 2010, at 9:10 PM, Ian McNamara wrote:
> so is this sort of like skype then? Ian McNamara.
>
> --
> You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups
> "MacVisionaries" group.
> To post to this group, send email
so is this sort of like skype then? Ian McNamara.
--
You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups
"MacVisionaries" group.
To post to this group, send email to macvisionar...@googlegroups.com.
To unsubscribe from this group, send email to
macvisionaries+unsubscr...@g
form that, oweing to the fact i've got a mini, with,
> obviously, no camera?
>
> - Original Message - From: "Chris Snyder"
> To:
> Sent: Wednesday, October 20, 2010 8:43 PM
> Subject: Re: facetime for mac is accessible! Yay!
>
>
> If you go to
got a mini, with,
> obviously, no camera?
>
> - Original Message - From: "Chris Snyder"
> To:
> Sent: Wednesday, October 20, 2010 8:43 PM
> Subject: Re: facetime for mac is accessible! Yay!
>
>
> If you go to apple.com and search for the term "fa
ubject: Re: facetime for mac is accessible! Yay!
If you go to apple.com and search for the term "facetime" you will find that
the first link that comes up is Facetime for the mac. Click on that, and
then there will be several headings talking about what you can do.
Eventually, there
the thing I don't like is the noise gate. it cuts off words and can make things
hard to understand. but all in all it is accessible. There is an unlabeled
button with no help tag in prefs though.
On Oct 20, 2010, at 6:43 PM, Chris Snyder wrote:
> If you go to apple.com and search for the term "f
If you go to apple.com and search for the term "facetime" you will find that
the first link that comes up is Facetime for the mac. Click on that, and then
there will be several headings talking about what you can do. Eventually, there
is a frame that says something like Choose a download site or
Do you have a pointer to download the beta?
On Oct 20, 2010, at 2:44 PM, Matthew Campbell wrote:
> Hello mac users.
> This is just to let you know that the face time beta for mac is accessible
> and works quite well.
> I've only found one un labeled button in the preferences.
> Enjoy.
> Matthew
Hello mac users.
This is just to let you know that the face time beta for mac is accessible and
works quite well.
I've only found one un labeled button in the preferences.
Enjoy.
Matthew Campbell
--
You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups
"MacVisionaries" group
22 matches
Mail list logo
