Re: [maemo-developers] Bug in Maemo's version of GTK-2.6 (Please nokia-devs look into this)

2005-11-07 Thread Tapani Pälli
ext Clemens Eisserer wrote: >This is the code I used for testing: > printf("\nDepth: %d", gdk_rgb_get_visual()->depth); > GdkPixmap* pix = gdk_pixmap_new (NULL, 10, 10, 16); > void* cm = gdk_drawable_get_colormap ((GdkDrawable *)pix); > printf("\nIt returned with 16-bit depth: %d", cm); > fflush(s

Re: [maemo-developers] Bug in Maemo's version of GTK-2.6 (Please nokia-devs look into this)

2005-11-07 Thread Tapani Pälli
ext Clemens Eisserer wrote: >Hi there, > >I think I've found a bug in Maemo's modified version of GTK-2.6. >The version which is installed on my 770 (both the original version >plus the latest update release) says that >"gdk_rgb_get_visual()->depth" is 24 whereas the X-Server running on >the Nok

[maemo-developers] What is the 770 display hardware able to accalerate?

2005-11-07 Thread Jari Kirma
Gustavo Sverzut Barbieri <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: On 11/7/05, Clemens Eisserer wrote: > Hi there, > > I just read that the 770 display hardware is quite slow but on the > other hand it supports pixel doubling which isn't such a trivial > feature at all. I think you mis understood that mail.

[maemo-developers] Alternative platforms ?

2005-11-07 Thread Glen Gray
Hey Guys, The maemo project looks really interesting. Currently it seems entirely focused on the Nokia 770 platform and I'm wondering if that's a valid impression ? I know a stated goal is to make it a platform of choice for internet tablets (or it least I thought I read that somewhere) s

[maemo-developers] Re: Bug in Maemo's version of GTK-2.6 (Please nokia-devs look into this)

2005-11-07 Thread Clemens Eisserer
btw. could be also a problem in maemo's X-Server reporting that it supports 24-bit although it doesn't. ___ maemo-developers mailing list maemo-developers@maemo.org https://maemo.org/mailman/listinfo/maemo-developers

Re: [maemo-developers] What is the 770 display hardware able to accalerate?

2005-11-07 Thread Gustavo Sverzut Barbieri
On 11/7/05, Clemens Eisserer <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > Hi there, > > I just read that the 770 display hardware is quite slow but on the > other hand it supports pixel doubling which isn't such a trivial > feature at all. I think you mis understood that mail. 1) pixel doubling is trivial, inste

[maemo-developers] What is the 770 display hardware able to accalerate?

2005-11-07 Thread Clemens Eisserer
Hi there, I just read that the 770 display hardware is quite slow but on the other hand it supports pixel doubling which isn't such a trivial feature at all. Does anybody know which operations are (at least partially) accalerated by the integrated graphic controler - e.g. are fills/draw/blit oper

[maemo-developers] Bug in Maemo's version of GTK-2.6 (Please nokia-devs look into this)

2005-11-07 Thread Clemens Eisserer
Hi there, I think I've found a bug in Maemo's modified version of GTK-2.6. The version which is installed on my 770 (both the original version plus the latest update release) says that "gdk_rgb_get_visual()->depth" is 24 whereas the X-Server running on the Nokia770 does not support pixmaps in 24

Re: [maemo-developers] The future of the Application installer

2005-11-07 Thread Gustavo Sverzut Barbieri
On 11/7/05, Marius Vollmer <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > Hi, > > as you all know, the current Application installer sucks more than > Cygnus X-1 [1], and this needs to change. > > The current plan is to use the full power of dpkg+apt and put a nice > GUI on top of it. The GUI design is pretty matur

[maemo-developers] Re: The future of the Application installer

2005-11-07 Thread Ross Burton
On Mon, 2005-11-07 at 18:17 +0100, Philippe De Swert wrote: > it also mentions udpkg which is used for udebs and might be of some use also. If that is the udpkg which is used by debian-installer, then it is simply a tool to extract debs and and doesn't do anything else. Do maintainer scripts, no

Re: [maemo-developers] HW accelerated pixel doubling in SDL games

2005-11-07 Thread Clemens Eisserer
Thanks! > It's useful for games which requires more drawing speed than with > 800x480 res. This is just again speed vs high res dilemma. If your game > doesn't update while screen at time (in terms of SDL this means you use > SDL_UpdateRect() functions instead of SDL_Flip()), you probably should >

Re: [maemo-developers] Re: Maemo on the 100-dollar laptop

2005-11-07 Thread Clemens Eisserer
Hi again, First of all I think this clearly belongs to maemo-users since maemo-developers is loaded enough with developer-only questions. > I think one thing people overlook with the HDC (hundred-dollar computer) is > that governments are expected to buy it, in quantities of millions. I think > t

Re: [maemo-developers] The future of the Application installer

2005-11-07 Thread Philippe De Swert
Hi, > > > I am not sure, but isn't ipkg smaller than dpkg-apt, doing same > > > things(more or less)? > > > > Does ipkg do *any* kind of conflict resolving, or even just checking > > whether there are conflicts? > > Not sure, but at least it works like apt comand. Give it a try. It does support s

Re: [maemo-developers] The future of the Application installer

2005-11-07 Thread Marius Vollmer
"ext Florian Boor" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes: > Independend from the definition of [embedded] it is a fact that the > 770 is a device with limited storage resources and that's exactly > what ipkg was made for. Well, excuse me for being purposefully dense here, but isn't every device 'limited' in

[maemo-developers] HW accelerated pixel doubling in SDL games

2005-11-07 Thread Kuisma Salonen
Hello everybody, there is added to wiki how you could this: https://maemo.org/maemowiki/GameDevelopment It's useful for games which requires more drawing speed than with 800x480 res. This is just again speed vs high res dilemma. If your game doesn't update while screen at time (in terms of SD

Re: [maemo-developers] The future of the Application installer

2005-11-07 Thread Marius Vollmer
"ext Koen Kooi" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes: > I like the idea of extra software being in /var/lib/install so it can't > mess up the rootfs is something goes wrongs. Hmm. That is something I have been thinking about, but it would require changes to the way dpkg etc work, no? The cleanest way to

Re: [maemo-developers] The future of the Application installer

2005-11-07 Thread Guillem Jover
On Mon, Nov 07, 2005 at 02:15:06PM +, ext Tomas Frydrych wrote: > The big issue is the screen realestate: even in the File Manager it is > difficult to get to your files in a folder if you have more than 3 or 4 > in there. The same goes for the installer: I am not sure what kind of UI > wou

Re: [maemo-developers] The future of the Application installer

2005-11-07 Thread Jose Manrique Lopez de la Fuente
2005/11/7, Eero Tamminen <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>: > Hi, > > > I am not sure, but isn't ipkg smaller than dpkg-apt, doing same > > things(more or less)? > > Does ipkg do *any* kind of conflict resolving, or even just checking > whether there are conflicts? Not sure, but at least it works like apt coman

Re: [maemo-developers] The future of the Application installer

2005-11-07 Thread Ian Oliver
In article <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>, Marius Vollmer wrote: > It will very likely be > implemented by canibalizing synaptic or some other existing graphical > package manager. Have you looked at what the Ubuntu guys are doing? They want to have a cross between synaptic, their current "Application Insta

Re: [maemo-developers] The future of the Application installer

2005-11-07 Thread Florian Boor
Hi, Marius Vollmer wrote: > It don't regard the 770 as an embedded system. Once you talk about > installing arbitrary software on a system, it is no longer embedded, > regardless of how limited its resources are. It is also quite > resourceful actually. I think there is a lot to be said about u

Re: [maemo-developers] The future of the Application installer

2005-11-07 Thread Tomas Frydrych
Marius Vollmer wrote: It don't regard the 770 as an embedded system. Once you talk about installing arbitrary software on a system, it is no longer embedded, regardless of how limited its resources are. It is also quite resourceful actually. I think there is a lot to be said about using the '

Re: [maemo-developers] The future of the Application installer

2005-11-07 Thread Eero Tamminen
Hi, > I am not sure, but isn't ipkg smaller than dpkg-apt, doing same > things(more or less)? Does ipkg do *any* kind of conflict resolving, or even just checking whether there are conflicts? - Eero ___ maemo-developers mailing list maemo-dev

Re: [maemo-developers] The future of the Application installer

2005-11-07 Thread Jose Manrique Lopez de la Fuente
2005/11/7, Marius Vollmer <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>: > "ext Jose Manrique Lopez de la Fuente" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes: > > It don't regard the 770 as an embedded system. Once you talk about > installing arbitrary software on a system, it is no longer embedded, > regardless of how limited its resource

Re: [maemo-developers] U.S. developer devices query

2005-11-07 Thread Adilson Oliveira
Gustavo Sverzut Barbieri escreveu: > On 11/7/05, Devesh Kothari <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > >>The US developers will start getting their mails this week starting >>today 07.11 > > > How about impatient Brazilians? :-) I second that! :) []s Adilson. P.S. Tá Osvaldo, eu não resisti :) ___

Re: [maemo-developers] The future of the Application installer

2005-11-07 Thread Marius Vollmer
"ext Jose Manrique Lopez de la Fuente" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes: > I am not sure if all the power of dpkg+apt would fit well in an > embedded system like the Nokia 770. It don't regard the 770 as an embedded system. Once you talk about installing arbitrary software on a system, it is no longer

Re: [maemo-developers] The future of the Application installer

2005-11-07 Thread Kalle Vahlman
2005/11/7, Marius Vollmer <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>: > Hi, > > as you all know, the current Application installer sucks more than > Cygnus X-1 [1], and this needs to change. \o/ > So, do you have any comments, feature requests, etc that go beyond > would you have on Debian already? Something that you

Re: [maemo-developers] The future of the Application installer

2005-11-07 Thread Jose Manrique Lopez de la Fuente
Hello, I am not sure if all the power of dpkg+apt would fit well in an embedded system like the Nokia 770. What about using the power of the ipkg software used in Familiar distro[1] that is even compatible with .deb packages? There is even a Gtk GUI for it developped by GPE people [2] ;) Have

Re: [maemo-developers] The future of the Application installer

2005-11-07 Thread Koen Kooi
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE- Hash: SHA1 Marius Vollmer wrote: > Hi, > > as you all know, the current Application installer sucks more than > Cygnus X-1 [1], and this needs to change. > > The current plan is to use the full power of dpkg+apt and put a nice > GUI on top of it. The GUI desig

[maemo-developers] The future of the Application installer

2005-11-07 Thread Marius Vollmer
Hi, as you all know, the current Application installer sucks more than Cygnus X-1 [1], and this needs to change. The current plan is to use the full power of dpkg+apt and put a nice GUI on top of it. The GUI design is pretty mature already and will be nice and friendly but still powerful. It wi

Re: [maemo-developers] U.S. developer devices query

2005-11-07 Thread Gustavo Sverzut Barbieri
On 11/7/05, Devesh Kothari <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > The US developers will start getting their mails this week starting > today 07.11 How about impatient Brazilians? :-) -- Gustavo Sverzut Barbieri -- Computer Engineer 2001 - UNICAMP Mobile: +55 (19) 9165 8