There is this still too abstract idea of tagging doc pages with status
i.e. "unreviewed draft", "official doc", "works for me" etc. Those tags
could be assigned either at an official level (to distinguish supported
docs from those not officially supported) or at a community level (to
distinguish go
awesome, feasibility is proven!
but, for a sustainable project is needs to be a port of a free client,
everaldo used freenx not a NX Client right?
AND it needs to be in a forge with the proper OSS license, then it needs to
be packaged and placed in a repo for maemo right?
-tom
___
I believe this one can be fixed by doing echo 0 > /proc/sys/kernel/vdso
This should fix the problem..
Regards,
Madhu
Your kernel needs VDSO compat enabled.
Cheers,
Daniel
___
maemo-developers mailing list
maemo-developers@maemo.org
https://maemo.or
On Thu, Feb 15, 2007 at 11:07:05PM +, Peter Robinson wrote:
> This list would be the best and from the last I saw on the list there
> still isn't any working java. From the last I saw javame r2 oss should
> compile on arm but I'm yet too see anyone try.
>
> I doubt with the 4+ variants of 'mob
Actually I have played around a bit with the wiimote on my laptop, but
have not really made it into something real. It of course would be
awesome to have this as an input device, it probably would make the most
sense to have a daemon to feed a /dev/input/jsX device. Is uinput
available on the N800
This list would be the best and from the last I saw on the list there
still isn't any working java. From the last I saw javame r2 oss should
compile on arm but I'm yet too see anyone try.
I doubt with the 4+ variants of 'mobile linux' that have sprung up in
the last year or so (maemo, openmoko, f
On Fri, Feb 16, 2007 at 12:29:49AM +0200, ext Karoliina Salminen wrote:
> My computer rebooted during compilation today because the battery run out
> and I originally thought that was the cause of the scratchbox breaking. So
> I removed scratchbox and reinstalled it. But still it does not work and
MoRpHeUz ([EMAIL PROTECTED]) wrote:
> Did you try using wii-mote driver for linux ? I think that Andreas
> want to know that...
Actually I have played around a bit with the wiimote on my laptop, but
have not really made it into something real. It of course would be
awesome to have this as an inpu
> Please read what I wrote: "The N800 [...] does not allow connecting
> without a passcode." The OK button gets greyed out when there are no
just go a little deeper into the "device" and of course you can connect
without passcode. hciconfig is your friend.
> digits entered. Of course the Wiimot
Brian Waite ([EMAIL PROTECTED]) wrote:
> On Thursday 15 February 2007 15:35, Simon Budig wrote:
> > Andreas Hubel ([EMAIL PROTECTED]) wrote:
> > > has somebody already tried to connect a Wii-Remote with an Nokia 770 or
> > > N800 via Bluetooth?
> >
> > Yep. The N800 discovers the Wiimote fine, howe
Hi,
My computer rebooted during compilation today because the battery run out
and I originally thought that was the cause of the scratchbox breaking. So
I removed scratchbox and reinstalled it. But still it does not work and by
digging maemo-developers it looks like somebody else has this same pro
your
licence, phone Microsoft when you fail authentication, reboot and
wait an hour while all the patches install.
Andy
-- next part --
An HTML attachment was scrubbed...
URL:
http://maemo.org/pipermail/maemo-developers/attachments/20070215/cdc461a3/attachment-0001.htm
--
Hi,
I tried to check the state of java on the maemo platform, because I want
to develop software for the device for my personal use. All information
I found was spreaded around the net, and finally I am not exactly clear
about what the state is.
I already searched quite a lot in this list and goog
Hi,
I did't rest before I got an answer
Hanno Zulla wrote:
> Hi,
>
>> I want to learn how to add new codecs to Maemo. So: Yes, I want direct
>> access to the DSP.
>>
>> Basically, I'm asking for what Frantisek just described in his message
>> "Maemo roadmap, SDK improvements..." to this list:
>>
On Thursday 15 February 2007 15:35, Simon Budig wrote:
> Andreas Hubel ([EMAIL PROTECTED]) wrote:
> > has somebody already tried to connect a Wii-Remote with an Nokia 770 or
> > N800 via Bluetooth?
>
> Yep. The N800 discovers the Wiimote fine, however, it does not allow
> connecting without a passc
Simon,
Did you try using wii-mote driver for linux ? I think that Andreas
want to know that...
Best regards,
On 2/15/07, Simon Budig <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
Andreas Hubel ([EMAIL PROTECTED]) wrote:
> has somebody already tried to connect a Wii-Remote with an Nokia 770 or
> N800 via Bluet
Andreas Hubel ([EMAIL PROTECTED]) wrote:
> has somebody already tried to connect a Wii-Remote with an Nokia 770 or
> N800 via Bluetooth?
Yep. The N800 discovers the Wiimote fine, however, it does not allow
connecting without a passcode. Passcode "" did not work. This would
probably need some h
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-
Hash: SHA1
Uwe Koch escreveu:
> Hi again,
>
> it seems that someone has already realized a lot:
> http://www.simios.org/blog/everaldo
>
> hope we can get the code.
>
> Uwe
To reach this stage is not a real problem because is relatively easy to
compile NX to a
Hi again,
it seems that someone has already realized a lot:
http://www.simios.org/blog/everaldo
hope we can get the code.
Uwe
__ _-_
\|).---'---`---.
||\._./
|| / ,' `---'
___||_,--'
Yes, and I actually see this as a feature, since there is no "apt-get
upgrade" functionality in the Application Manager. Users would get
the newer vesion of cairo by accident, when they install or upgrade a
non-hidden package that depends on cairo.
Semi-related: how about an "Upgrade All" butto
"ext Levi Bard" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes:
> Say you've just released an OS metapackage, maemo 3.1 sturgeon, and
> then one the guys working on cairo makes a huge breakthrough in
> speed and stability. You want users to be able to upgrade, but now
> you have to release a new OS metapackage to do
My thought is that it might be worthwhile to have a constant warning written
at the bottom of the "Check for Updates" dialog in the Application manager.
A user should really backup before any update, but prompting with a dialog
that frequently will only encourage users to ignore it. Major updates
In the future, we hope to be able to provide official updates to the
operating system itself via packages, and we need to give the
end-users the confidence that when they intend to install a Nokia
provided operating system update, they actually get what they think
they are getting.
Great! It'll
On 15 Feb 2007, at 16:39, Marius Vollmer wrote:
"ext Andy Mulhearn" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes:
I suppose that depends on how reliable is the incremental flash
process. If it's 100% then there should be no problems with what you
suggest.
That's one thing that we have to figure out.
Non-tr
On 15 Feb 2007, at 16:47, Paul Klapperich wrote:
On 2/15/07, Marius Vollmer <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> My only concern would be getting into a Windows XP-like situation
> where you reinstall with XP SP1 becaude that's what came with your
> system and then have to install SP2 and 100+ hotfixes
Hi,
has somebody already tried to connect a Wii-Remote with an Nokia 770 or
N800 via Bluetooth?
see
http://www.wiili.org/index.php/Wiimote
for more infos
___
maemo-developers mailing list
maemo-developers@maemo.org
https://maemo.org/mailman/listinfo/ma
Carlos Guerreiro <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes:
>> I grant you a brief peek into our internal software
>> requirements... :-)
>>
>> 22.3.1.3: The Application manager shall suggest a backup to be taken
>>before a system update is installed.
>>
>> Rebooting and checking for enough free fla
I grant you a brief peek into our internal software
requirements... :-)
22.3.1.3: The Application manager shall suggest a backup to be taken
before a system update is installed.
Rebooting and checking for enough free flash will also be taken care
of.
Yeah, we should be doing this
"ext Paul Klapperich" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes:
> 22.3.1.3: The Application manager shall suggest a backup to be taken
>before a system update is installed.
>
> Would this just be for major updates--perhaps those than cause a
> change in the firmware revision number--or would
On 2/15/07, Marius Vollmer <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
I grant you a brief peek into our internal software
requirements... :-)
22.3.1.3: The Application manager shall suggest a backup to be taken
before a system update is installed.
Rebooting and checking for enough free flash will a
On 2/15/07, Marius Vollmer <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> My only concern would be getting into a Windows XP-like situation
> where you reinstall with XP SP1 becaude that's what came with your
> system and then have to install SP2 and 100+ hotfixes to get back to
> where you were.
I have zero exp
"ext Eero Tamminen" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes:
> ext Andy Mulhearn wrote:
>
>> But if you can just apply a major firmware upgrade by accepting it
>> in application manager and you don't think to backup first, what
>> happens it goes wrong leaving you with an unworkable system?
>
> Good point, I t
"ext Andy Mulhearn" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes:
> I suppose that depends on how reliable is the incremental flash
> process. If it's 100% then there should be no problems with what you
> suggest.
That's one thing that we have to figure out.
> My only concern would be getting into a Windows XP-li
Hi,
ext Andy Mulhearn wrote:
So are you looking to move away from the System Upgrade := reflash
device model? If so, then GOOD!
To be honest I prefer this route now, if only from the point of view
that if I bork my device I can reflash an image and get it working
again.
I am not sure if there
On Thursday, February 15, 2007, at 04:12PM, "Marius Vollmer" <[EMAIL
PROTECTED]> wrote:
>"ext Andy Mulhearn" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes:
>
>>> So are you looking to move away from the System Upgrade := reflash
>>> device model? If so, then GOOD!
>>
>> To be honest I prefer this route now, if on
"ext Andy Mulhearn" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes:
>> So are you looking to move away from the System Upgrade := reflash
>> device model? If so, then GOOD!
>
> To be honest I prefer this route now, if only from the point of view
> that if I bork my device I can reflash an image and get it working
>
"ext David Hagood" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes:
> Might I suggest two meta packages - one locked down to "This version
> only" and one specifying "this version or later."
As Paul says, I think we can leave this second meta package out of the
official releases.
_
On 2/15/07, Marius Vollmer <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
The set of trusted sources will be under control of a power-user: you
can just add some GPG keys to the right place, but there is no UI to
do it. You can also switch the whole lock-down machinery off by going
to red-pill mode.
So whaddaya t
On 2/15/07, Ian <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
Hi,
> We would like to encourage all of you to start using the new pages as soon as
> the wiki import has been completed. However the current maemo wiki will be
> available for some time, but we will do __no more__ automated page conversion.
> We could b
Hi,
> We would like to encourage all of you to start using the new pages as soon as
> the wiki import has been completed. However the current maemo wiki will be
> available for some time, but we will do __no more__ automated page conversion.
> We could be radical and disable editing of the "old" pa
On Thursday, February 15, 2007, at 01:09PM, "David Hagood" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
wrote:
>Marius Vollmer wrote:
>> We would like to get your feedback on these plans, both from the
>> end-user point of view and from the point of view of package
>> developers.
>>
>>
>Thank you for asking. That att
Dear maemo.org wiki Editors and Readers,
We are in the middle of converting the old documentation to our new Midgard
Content Management System. As part of this activity we have created a tool that
will import the existing wiki pages to Midgard's Markdown [1] syntax. The
documents written by you wi
Marius Vollmer wrote:
We would like to get your feedback on these plans, both from the
end-user point of view and from the point of view of package
developers.
Thank you for asking. That attitude is one of the reasons I like this
platform.
There is going to be a 'meta' package that represen
"ext Jonathan Greene" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes:
> As a user, I like how this sounds. I hope it also means that the
> Application Manager and user experience will be largely free of
> having to add repositories.
That is a separate thing, but yes, locking down system package
upgrades might make
As a user, I like how this sounds. I hope it also means that the
Application Manager and user experience will be largely free of having
to add repositories. This could make finding new applications easier
and more complete than the current process which still requires some
desire to explore and
Hi all,
I am trying to get something working. I have both a 770 and 800 and am
trying to get the wlan to register power level correctly when I use
aircrack. Right now all it only shows the power as -96. Is there a way to do
this? Can the drivers be changed on either system?
Thank you
Michael
On Thu 15. Feb - 13:12:46, [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
> Hi,
>
> Look at your Debian packaging, debian/control, and if you see the usual
> "Depends: {shlibs:Depends}" there, then you know that your Bora SDK
> built package will almost certainly not install any IT-2006.
Yes, that's it.
>
> However
Hi,
Look at your Debian packaging, debian/control, and if you see the usual
"Depends: {shlibs:Depends}" there, then you know that your Bora SDK
built package will almost certainly not install any IT-2006.
However if you build your application for IT-2006 (e.g. with Mistral
SDK) then there is rea
Hi,
we are planning to put some features into the Application Manager that
will make it more restrictive when handling the packages that make up
the operating system itself (as opposed to third party applications).
We would like to get your feedback on these plans, both from the
end-user point of
On Thu, 2007-02-15 at 11:22 +0100, Holger Macht wrote:
> application mmpc [1] is my first debian package ever. I'm developing for
> OS 2007. I hoped that the packages I uploaded would be compatible with OS
> 2006, but now I get user reports that they are not. It is a dependency
> issue:
>
> hild
Hi,
application mmpc [1] is my first debian package ever. I'm developing for
OS 2007. I hoped that the packages I uploaded would be compatible with OS
2006, but now I get user reports that they are not. It is a dependency
issue:
hildon-libs0 (>= 0.14.11-1) needed
Maybe someone can give me a hi
Hi all!
Recently there has been lots of fuzz about using the different
hardware acceleration options available on the N800 (DSP, FPU and the
PowerVR chip) with various success levels. The PowerVR chip seems to
be completely out-of-reach (barring a miracle), the DSP is used by
selected amount of N
ext Matthias Stürmer wrote:
Am Mittwoch, den 14.02.2007, 22:37 +0100 schrieb Laurent GUERBY:
Who's going to FOSDEM this year?
I'll be going and participating in a panel discussion on company
involvement in open source projects
http://www.fosdem.org/2007/schedule/events/research_panels_
Hi,
ext Marius Gedminas wrote:
http://770.fs-security.com/extra-layouts/kb-layout-sample.tar.gz
Do you really need all that autoconf stuff that weights 400 kb to
accompany a single .xml file that weighs 12 kb?
Yes :) The included scripts are also meant as an example, it's not that
easy to set
54 matches
Mail list logo
