RE: sapwood bug

2007-08-17 Thread Li, Frank
Cheers, Xan: Thank you for your response. Do you means you will fix it soon? Could you please tell me when you fix it? Best regards Frank Li -Original Message- From: Xan [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Sent: 2007年8月18日 4:12 To: Li, Frank Cc: maemo-developers@maemo.org

Re: sapwood big

2007-08-17 Thread Xan
On 8/7/07, Li, Frank <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > Tommi: > > I found a problem at draw_shadow function of sapwood-draw.c > file. > gtk_clist_expose will call gtk_draw_shadow (); Then > gtk_draw_shadow will call style->draw_shadow, which is point to > draw_shadow function of sapwood-

Profiling on the N800?

2007-08-17 Thread David Huggins-Daines
Hi, Is it possible to use gprof on binaries compiled for the N800? Or is there any other means of profiling? Thanks! ___ maemo-developers mailing list maemo-developers@maemo.org https://lists.maemo.org/mailman/listinfo/maemo-developers

Re: Software categories

2007-08-17 Thread Ed Bartosh
On Fri, 2007-08-17 at 12:23 +0300, Lauri Leukkunen wrote: > On 17/08/07 11:37 +0300, ext Ed Bartosh wrote: > > BTW, Debian and other linux distributions proved central repository > > concept long time ago. I have no idea why we didn't follow it from the > > start, but re-invented Windows-like one-c

Re: Software categories

2007-08-17 Thread Marius Vollmer
"ext Daniel Stone" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes: > My assertion -- and I take this is axiomatic -- is that every change we > have to make that can be trivially eliminated, should. Yeah, but we can debate what is trivial and what is not... :) For example, I did the wrong thing again when making pac

Re: Software categories

2007-08-17 Thread Ed Bartosh
On Fri, 2007-08-17 at 12:02 +0300, Quim Gil wrote: > Install files have nothing to do with repositories, they solve different > problems. Are you sure? I still think that AM adds repositories from .install files to its configuration. > Easy although potentially messy install files vs efficient >

Re: Software categories

2007-08-17 Thread Marius Vollmer
"ext Daniel Stone" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes: > On Fri, Aug 17, 2007 at 11:37:18AM +0300, ext Ed Bartosh wrote: >> BTW, Debian and other linux distributions proved central repository >> concept long time ago. I have no idea why we didn't follow it from the >> start, but re-invented Windows-like o

Re: Software categories

2007-08-17 Thread Marius Vollmer
Ed Bartosh <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes: > BTW, Debian and other linux distributions proved central repository > concept long time ago. I have no idea why we didn't follow it from > the start, but re-invented Windows-like one-click installations > instead. Yeah, the fact that .install files can add

Re: Software categories

2007-08-17 Thread Lauri Leukkunen
On 17/08/07 11:37 +0300, ext Ed Bartosh wrote: > BTW, Debian and other linux distributions proved central repository > concept long time ago. I have no idea why we didn't follow it from the > start, but re-invented Windows-like one-click installations instead. I remember. We were supposed to shave

Re: Software categories

2007-08-17 Thread Quim Gil
Install files have nothing to do with repositories, they solve different problems. Easy although potentially messy install files vs efficient although potentially harder to use APT tools might have to have a relation between mainstream vs cult. Don't get me wrong, I'm a happy Synaptic user in my d

Re: Software categories

2007-08-17 Thread Daniel Stone
On Fri, Aug 17, 2007 at 11:37:18AM +0300, ext Ed Bartosh wrote: > BTW, Debian and other linux distributions proved central repository > concept long time ago. I have no idea why we didn't follow it from the > start, but re-invented Windows-like one-click installations instead. Well, given that non

Re: Software categories

2007-08-17 Thread Ed Bartosh
On Fri, 2007-08-17 at 08:58 +0300, Quim Gil wrote: > The install files don't bring any mess, they just make the mess more > transparent and accessible. Don't kill the messenger, though. Instead, > fix the mess. I didn't say that. I said that they're hiding the mess, which is bad thing from my point

Re: do we need garage sandbox repos?

2007-08-17 Thread Marius Vollmer
Ed Bartosh <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes: > On Thu, 2007-08-16 at 17:22 +0300, Marius Vollmer wrote: >> Ed Bartosh <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes: >> >> > On Thu, 2007-08-16 at 16:51 +0300, Marius Vollmer wrote: >> >> "ext Ed Bartosh" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes: >> >> >> >> > What do you think? >> >>

Re: Do you ltrace work well?

2007-08-17 Thread Eero Tamminen
Hi, ext ?? wrote: > I download ltrace source code from > http://repository.maemo.org/pool/maemo/ossw/source/l/ltrace/ and build it. > but it can' t work . > > Nokia-N800-12:~# ./ltrace -p 889 > breakpointed at 0xb9a4 (?) > __libc_start_main(69245, 1, 0xbecea6f4, 70500, 70596 > breakpointed

Re: Do you ltrace work well?

2007-08-17 Thread Daniel Stone
On Fri, Aug 17, 2007 at 03:26:10PM +0800, ext 杨明 wrote: > I download ltrace-0.3.31 from > http://repository.maemo.org/pool/maemo/ossw/source/l/ltrace/ > > # cd ltrace-0.3.31 > # ./configure > update make file add -fomit-frame-pointer to CFLAG > > # make > > upload to n800, , N800 have flash wit

Re: Do you ltrace work well?

2007-08-17 Thread 杨明
I download ltrace-0.3.31 from http://repository.maemo.org/pool/maemo/ossw/source/l/ltrace/ # cd ltrace-0.3.31 # ./configure update make file add -fomit-frame-pointer to CFLAG # make upload to n800, , N800 have flash with Maemo_Dev_Platform_v3.1_armel- rootfs.jffs2. But ltrace can't work , same