RE: autoconf upgrade problem

2008-05-04 Thread josh.soref
Kwan Hong Lee wrote: > For some reason, even if I have the new autoconf directory > added to the beginning of the directory, when I call > pulseaudio/autogen.sh it uses the older autoconf, currently > 2.59. I can't modify sb_autoconf_wrapper because it's read only. > > What can I do? Please d

Re: Low Battery signal N800/N810

2008-05-04 Thread kumar lomash
Thanks Kees, Actually I was looking for some API which could poll these messages for me inside my application so that I could attach it to my g_main loop and do other things in the same thread. Luckily for me I found the solution in the source code of ACMonitor. Here is what I did for battery: bat

Re: Corporate ownership of open source projects [LWN]

2008-05-04 Thread ed
> [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote: >> A possible interim solution is to use one like nVidia has used for years >> for their closed video card drivers. Provide a binary object that >> implements all the core functionality of the chip, with a public API. >> Then have an open source kernel module wrapper tha

Re: Corporate ownership of open source projects [LWN]

2008-05-04 Thread Frantisek Dufka
[EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote: > A possible interim solution is to use one like nVidia has used for years > for their closed video card drivers. Provide a binary object that > implements all the core functionality of the chip, with a public API. > Then have an open source kernel module wrapper that cal

Re: Low Battery signal N800/N810

2008-05-04 Thread Kees Jongenburger
Hi I am fairly new to dbus but if you run dbus-monitor --system from a console and hover over the battery monitor applet you will see what calls are used to get this information. Nokia-N810-50-2:~# dbus-monitor --system signal sender=org.freedesktop.DBus -> dest=:1.67 path=/org/freedesktop/DBus;

Re: Corporate ownership of open source projects [LWN]

2008-05-04 Thread Frantisek Dufka
Igor Stoppa wrote: > -serial console: > that can be obtained with some hacking by attaching a level shifter and > a serial connector to the serial pads exposed, it would be enough to > release schematic and layout (although i think there are already > unofficial howtos) For 770 those pin are know

Re: Corporate ownership of open source projects [LWN]

2008-05-04 Thread ed
> Hi Ed, > good to see you still around here! I'm always lurking. :) > On Sun, 2008-05-04 at 11:20 -0500, ext [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote: >> > Hi, >> > >> > On Sun, May 4, 2008 at 3:30 PM, Hans J. Koch <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: >> >> Am Sat, 03 May 2008 20:53:53 +0300 >> >> schrieb Igor Stoppa <[EM

Re: Corporate ownership of open source projects [LWN]

2008-05-04 Thread Igor Stoppa
Hi Ed, good to see you still around here! On Sun, 2008-05-04 at 11:20 -0500, ext [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote: > > Hi, > > > > On Sun, May 4, 2008 at 3:30 PM, Hans J. Koch <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > >> Am Sat, 03 May 2008 20:53:53 +0300 > >> schrieb Igor Stoppa <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>: > >> > >>> > I dis

Re: Corporate ownership of open source projects [LWN]

2008-05-04 Thread ed
> Hi, > > On Sun, May 4, 2008 at 3:30 PM, Hans J. Koch <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: >> Am Sat, 03 May 2008 20:53:53 +0300 >> schrieb Igor Stoppa <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>: >> >>> > I disagree. Any closed part in a Linux system forces developers to >>> > implement stupid wrappers and workarounds somewhere.

Re: Corporate ownership of open source projects [LWN]

2008-05-04 Thread nick loeve
Hi, On Sun, May 4, 2008 at 3:30 PM, Hans J. Koch <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > Am Sat, 03 May 2008 20:53:53 +0300 > schrieb Igor Stoppa <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>: > >> > I disagree. Any closed part in a Linux system forces developers to >> > implement stupid wrappers and workarounds somewhere. If I'm for

Re: Corporate ownership of open source projects [LWN]

2008-05-04 Thread Hans J. Koch
Am Sat, 03 May 2008 20:53:53 +0300 schrieb Igor Stoppa <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>: > > I disagree. Any closed part in a Linux system forces developers to > > implement stupid wrappers and workarounds somewhere. If I'm forced > > to use a certain kernel or glibc version, it's not an open system. > > Prob

Re: Is it possible to port Maemo to other ARM devices?

2008-05-04 Thread Ryan Pavlik
Neal.Yuan wrote: > > Hi all, > > > >I am interested in porting Maemo to other ARM devices. But I > find no one have a try before. So I want to know is it possible and > legal? > > > > Neal Yuan > You might want to look into Mamona which is working on building an open-source Maemo ima

Re: Can't build i386 version of my package -- "checking for linux kernel module build works .. no"

2008-05-04 Thread Jason Edgecombe
Jason Edgecombe wrote: > Kees Jongenburger wrote: > >> : >> >> >>> checking for linux kernel module build works...no" >>> configure:error: fix problem or use --disable-kernel-module >>> >>> >> hi, i suggest you do what the configure suggests and run configure >> with

Re: Can't build i386 version of my package -- "checking for linux kernel module build works .. no"

2008-05-04 Thread Jason Edgecombe
Kees Jongenburger wrote: > : > >> checking for linux kernel module build works...no" >> configure:error: fix problem or use --disable-kernel-module >> > hi, i suggest you do what the configure suggests and run configure > with the given option. > > i am pretty sure people don't want

Is it possible to port Maemo to other ARM devices?

2008-05-04 Thread Neal.Yuan
Hi all, I am interested in porting Maemo to other ARM devices. But I find no one have a try before. So I want to know is it possible and legal? Neal Yuan ___ maemo-developers mailing list maemo-developers@maemo.org https://lists.maemo.org