Re: Proposal for Diablo's authoritative list of package categories

2008-10-28 Thread Ryan Abel
On Oct 28, 2008, at 9:13 PM, Glen Ditchfield wrote: > Ryan Abel wrote: >> KeyEnglish i18n Examples >> user/development ProgrammingPy2Deb > > In the other 10 cases, the English string is the same as the tail > end of the > key. For consistency, could the English string in

Re: Adding basic Maemo apps on Hildon Application Framework

2008-10-28 Thread Marius Gedminas
On Mon, Oct 27, 2008 at 08:09:42PM +0100, piotr maliński wrote: > I've installed Scratchbox and Maemo SDK, I've installed a x86 target > with all packages. The Hildon Application Framework works in Xephyr > but it's empty - no apps. > > What packages I have to install to get basic apps under HAF?

Re: Proposal for Diablo's authoritative list of package categories

2008-10-28 Thread Glen Ditchfield
Ryan Abel wrote: > Key                English i18n   Examples > user/development   Programming    Py2Deb In the other 10 cases, the English string is the same as the tail end of the key. For consistency, could the English string in this case be "Development"?

Is it possible to move N810's task bar from the left side to the bottom of the display?

2008-10-28 Thread Alex Leung
Dear friends in the maemo community, I would like to move the task bar, which currently on the left pane to the bottom of the LCD display, in order to make its ort of like the traditional layout of Windows XP. Anyone done that before? Please kindly give me some instructions for achieving this obj

Re: Proposal for Diablo's authoritative list of package categories

2008-10-28 Thread Ryan Abel
On Oct 28, 2008, at 11:18 AM, Andrew Flegg wrote: > However, although I think the new UI is an improvement, it shouldn't > be the UI which gets into fremantle's Application Manager for the > default starting point of installing an app; it should be *much* > prettier, with icons 'n' stuff. Clearl

Re: Proposal for Diablo's authoritative list of package categories

2008-10-28 Thread Andrew Flegg
On Tue, Oct 28, 2008 at 3:05 PM, Ryan Abel <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > > On that note, in windowed mode, there are 12 category buttons visible > on-screen with Jaffa's patch, but the 5th line (which would bring us > to 15 categories) is almost (but not quite) completely visible on > screen. Does a

Re: Proposal for Diablo's authoritative list of package categories

2008-10-28 Thread Ryan Abel
I'll note that I've added user/science ScienceScientific and engineering applications To the list on the wiki at the request of Yves (who, presumably, accidentally emailed me directly off-list). I figure it makes sense to have a Science section if we have an Education section

Re: Proposal for Diablo's authoritative list of package categories

2008-10-28 Thread Ryan Abel
On Oct 28, 2008, at 10:34 AM, Marius Vollmer wrote: > "ext Ryan Abel" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes: > >> So after a fair bit of discussion, we've arrive at a suitable list of >> package categories: > > Excellent! Just for completeness, what about also listing "All" and > "Others"? These need to be

Re: Application manager category view proposals

2008-10-28 Thread Ryan Abel
On Oct 28, 2008, at 10:30 AM, Marius Vollmer wrote: > "ext Andrew Flegg" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes: > >> On Tue, Oct 28, 2008 at 11:33 AM, Ryan Abel <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> >> wrote: >>> >> [forcing packages to comply with the "definitive" package list] >>> >>> The reason I like doing this Applicat

Re: Proposal for Diablo's authoritative list of package categories

2008-10-28 Thread Marius Vollmer
"ext Ryan Abel" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes: > So after a fair bit of discussion, we've arrive at a suitable list of > package categories: Excellent! Just for completeness, what about also listing "All" and "Others"? These need to be translated as well, but maybe it is better to keep them out

Re: Application manager category view proposals

2008-10-28 Thread Marius Vollmer
"ext Andrew Flegg" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes: > On Tue, Oct 28, 2008 at 11:33 AM, Ryan Abel <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: >> > [forcing packages to comply with the "definitive" package list] >> >> The reason I like doing this Application Manager-side is that it forces >> compliance even for stuff no

RE: Application manager category view proposals

2008-10-28 Thread Simon Pickering
> Having thought about it a bit more, I think there are 3 > realistic scenarios: > > 1) Force the Application Manager to do it, based on a simple rule >like having an i18n label defined. > 2) Force the Application Manager to do it, with an > external package >defining the

Re: Application manager category view proposals

2008-10-28 Thread Andrew Flegg
On Tue, Oct 28, 2008 at 11:33 AM, Ryan Abel <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > [forcing packages to comply with the "definitive" package list] > > The reason I like doing this Application Manager-side is that it forces > compliance even for stuff not going through the autobuilder or Extras. This > preven

Re: Application manager category view proposals

2008-10-28 Thread Ryan Abel
On Oct 27, 2008, at 10:47 AM, Marius Vollmer wrote: > "ext Andrew Flegg" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes: > >> On Mon, Oct 27, 2008 at 1:47 PM, Marius Vollmer >> <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: >>> >> [snip: packages with sections which aren't "liked"] >>> >>> You don't need to reject the packages: you can

Proposal for Diablo's authoritative list of package categories

2008-10-28 Thread Ryan Abel
So after a fair bit of discussion, we've arrive at a suitable list of package categories: KeyEnglish i18n Examples user/desktop Desktop* applets user/development ProgrammingPy2Deb user/education EducationalFlashcard user/games Games