On Wed, Oct 29, 2008 at 05:43:11PM +0100, [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
> On Wed, Oct 29, 2008 at 09:00:20AM -0700, Tim Ashman wrote:
> > On Wednesday 29 October 2008 08:30:51 am Ryan Abel wrote:
> > > Did you go to the correct page for your unit?
> > >
> > I did, not only that when I was on the phone w
On Oct 29, 2008, at 8:50 AM, Simon Pickering wrote:
>> - Development worklow? Do you want to have a structured
>> process with an
>> agreed set of features in scope, a UI plan and so on or do you see
>> better to continue the ad hoc approach of discussion+patches?
>> Specially
>> if you expect us
Hi there.
On Wed, Oct 29, 2008 at 09:00:20AM -0700, Tim Ashman wrote:
> On Wednesday 29 October 2008 08:30:51 am Ryan Abel wrote:
> > Did you go to the correct page for your unit?
> >
> I did, not only that when I was on the phone with tech support I asked him to
> check my ID number and he told
"ext Andrew Flegg" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes:
> On Wed, Oct 29, 2008 at 2:24 PM, Marius Vollmer
> <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
>
>> Sources are now on Gitorious:
>>
>>http://gitorious.org/projects/hildon-application-manager
>
> Why the move to git? Is this just some tool fetishism or did the sv
On Wednesday 29 October 2008 08:30:51 am Ryan Abel wrote:
> On Oct 29, 2008, at 11:10 AM, Tim Ashman wrote:
> > I tried the linux manual way. I went to my other computer
> > downloaded the
> > flash command utility and proceeded to the "get the image" page. I
> > entered
> > in my WLAN ID and the
On Oct 29, 2008, at 11:10 AM, Tim Ashman wrote:
> I tried the linux manual way. I went to my other computer
> downloaded the
> flash command utility and proceeded to the "get the image" page. I
> entered
> in my WLAN ID and the page reports that it is not a valid product.
> Great.
Did yo
Hopefully someone can help me. Nokia's phone support wants me to send the
unit in and I'm just not going to do that. Here is my problem.
Last night I nuked the ability of my n810 to boot. I came in this morning
downloaded the windows flasher utility and proceeded to try and reflash the
unit
On Wed, Oct 29, 2008 at 2:24 PM, Marius Vollmer
<[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
>
> The Application manager for Fremantle is developed openly:
>
>http://hildon-app-mgr.garage.maemo.org/devel.html
Glad to see this has been updated :-)
> Sources are now on Gitorious:
>
>http://gitorious.org/proj
"ext Ryan Abel" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes:
> The community has plans, Nokia, but they're really hard to act on
> unless we know what you're up to. Help us to help you. :)
The Application manager for Fremantle is developed openly:
http://hildon-app-mgr.garage.maemo.org/devel.html
Sources ar
> - Development worklow? Do you want to have a structured
> process with an
> agreed set of features in scope, a UI plan and so on or do you see
> better to continue the ad hoc approach of discussion+patches?
> Specially
> if you expect us providing i.e. nice icons this is not something that
>
ext Ryan Abel wrote:
> On Oct 28, 2008, at 11:18 AM, Andrew Flegg wrote:
>
>> However, although I think the new UI is an improvement, it shouldn't
>> be the UI which gets into fremantle's Application Manager for the
>> default starting point of installing an app; it should be *much*
>> prettier,
2008/10/29 Andrew Flegg <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>:
> On Wed, Oct 29, 2008 at 10:40 AM, Neil Jerram <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
>>
> [snip]
>>
>> Agree with all that. However, if "Programming" is a better English
>> term than "Development" - which I agree with - surely the section name
>> should be "users
"ext Andrew Flegg" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes:
> I think it's important they all fit, so an interim version which
> shaves the pixels off (although that assumes the font size isn't
> increased) would be useful.
That's what I did: there are now three columns and five rows visible
without scrolling
"ext Ryan Abel" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes:
> So while they should be valid, localized sections from h-a-m's point
> of view, they shouldn't be valid sections for packages (I don't want
> to see any debs with user/other or user/all ;)).
Yes, very good point.
__
On Wed, Oct 29, 2008 at 10:40 AM, Neil Jerram <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
>
[snip]
>
> Agree with all that. However, if "Programming" is a better English
> term than "Development" - which I agree with - surely the section name
> should be "users/programming"?
Why, though? The "technical English" k
2008/10/29 Andrew Flegg <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>:
> 1) "Consistency" - with what? Why is consistency between the package
> maintainer's key and the displayed text /in one language/
> important?
>
> 2) These are *example* English versions. Further discussions have
> resulted in other s
On Wed, Oct 29, 2008 at 6:27 AM, Ryan Abel <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> On Oct 28, 2008, at 9:13 PM, Glen Ditchfield wrote:
>
>> In the other 10 cases, the English string is the same as the tail
>> end of the
>> key. For consistency, could the English string in this case
>> be "Development"?
>
> W
17 matches
Mail list logo
