On Saturday 26 September 2009 15:00:33 Thomas Perl wrote:
> I'd rather do without the scrolling if possible. Here's my mock-up and the
> accompanying Python script that you can use to try it out:
I like the approach. Good demo!
I am not sure about the particular colours: it seems to be missing a
Andre Klapper pisze:
> Hi,
>
> Am Donnerstag, den 24.09.2009, 19:14 +0200 schrieb Damian Piotr
> Melniczuk:
>> my name is Damian Melniczuk and I'm president of AASOC - student
>> organisation which main purpose is to promote FLOSS. We are organising
>> celebration of SFD in Wroclaw in Poland. I th
On Sep 26, 2009, at 9:27, Thomas Waelti wrote:
> Unfrtunatelely, that info about the package version never arrived in
> the repository or package viewer. So I guess there must be a bug
> somewhere in my package files.
There is, it's in the changelog.
> However, looking at the files in e.g.
On Sat, Sep 26, 2009 at 2:00 PM, Thomas Perl wrote:
> 2009/9/26 Cornelius Hald :
> > So how about a dialog that just shows n rows with 3 to 4 colors in each
> > row. Those rows are in a panable area so it's easy to scroll them. Those
> > colors are taken from a palette and (maybe) colors that hav
2009/9/26 Cornelius Hald :
> So how about a dialog that just shows n rows with 3 to 4 colors in each
> row. Those rows are in a panable area so it's easy to scroll them. Those
> colors are taken from a palette and (maybe) colors that have been
> selected in the advanced dialog are appended at the t
On Fri, 2009-09-25 at 22:55 +0200, Thomas Perl wrote:
> Depending on the use case, having a nice finger-friendly color palette
> could be *much* better than letting the user fine-tune the colors. I think
> most color-choosing tasks (e.g. in Conboy) are not about getting some
> really specific shade
>> The second issue seems to be a bug somewhere between py2deb,
>> autobuilder and the uploader to the repos: the build number isn't
>> recognized by the repo loader.
>
> By "build number" do you mean package version?
Yes, I mean package version, sorry for the wrong terminology.
> Just to clarify
