On Tue, Sep 28, 2010 at 19:57, Eino-Ville Talvala wrote:
>
[snip]
>
> Since FCam is a publicly-available API that we're trying to promote, we're
> expecting third parties to write applications that depend on fcam-drivers.
> That means not all apps will be ours, and we can't do the update for them
On 9/27/2010 8:59 PM, Alistair Buxton wrote:
On 28 September 2010 00:41, Eino-Ville Talvala wrote:
Hi,
I have a question about how extras packages not in the user/* hierarchy
interact with the application manager and updating.
As part of the FCam API, we have a package, fcam-drivers, whic
