Re: adaptation of Extras QA hurdles

2011-01-26 Thread Riku Voipio
On 01/25/2011 05:24 PM, ext Andrew Flegg wrote: > On Tue, Jan 25, 2011 at 15:03, Felipe Crochik wrote: >> A new version of an existing application should have a lower barrier to >> promotion than a new application. > It's obvious; but even a minor change can have an enormous impact. > However, it

Re: adaptation of Extras QA hurdles

2011-01-26 Thread Andrew Flegg
On Wed, Jan 26, 2011 at 13:18, Roman Morawek wrote: > > I just want to remark, that this proposal would not change anything in > my specific situation. I'm not listed in the top-products-karma-page and > would still need 10 votes, which seems to take very long time. Indeed. This is, however, what

Re: adaptation of Extras QA hurdles

2011-01-26 Thread Roman Morawek
Hello Andrew, On 25.01.2011 16:24, Andrew Flegg wrote: > Agreed. Proposal: > > * The first page of http://maemo.org/profile/list/category/products/ are > given "track-record" status. > > * Other accounts can be given "track-record" status by two developers > who have "track-record" s

Re: adaptation of Extras QA hurdles

2011-01-26 Thread Andrew Flegg
On Tue, Jan 25, 2011 at 15:57, Felipe Crochik wrote: > > Would we still have the requirement of "official tester" vote(s) or any > community member vote will have the same weight? I'm not sure what you mean. As I understand it at the moment, the requirement is that you get 10 votes and at least 1