Re: Proposal: code review process for community SSU

2011-02-07 Thread Alberto Mardegan
On 02/07/2011 02:24 PM, Andrew Flegg wrote: For example, Gitorious is _supposed_ to allow effective code review: http://blog.gitorious.org/2009/11/06/awesome-code-review/ I added one section on "How to contribute" here: http://wiki.maemo.org/Community_SSU/Development It's just the first

Re: Proposal: code review process for community SSU

2011-02-07 Thread Alberto Mardegan
On 02/07/2011 02:24 PM, Andrew Flegg wrote: Surely these are solved and/or solvable? Your preference may be for the ML, but I would suspect that's a personal preference. For example, Gitorious is _supposed_ to allow effective code review: http://blog.gitorious.org/2009/11/06/awesome-code-r

Re: Proposal: code review process for community SSU

2011-02-07 Thread Andrew Flegg
On Sun, Feb 6, 2011 at 19:37, Alberto Mardegan wrote: > > Sorry, I didn't weight my words correctly: I didn't mean to write > "critical" in the sense of "makes the phone unusable", I just meant > something affecting many users. But the point is that with the current > situation, much more dangerou