I can confirm that the standard upload method doesn't seem to work here
(I tried the screenshot from the forum thread). Unless there's
something odd going on with the image itself.
-Eino-Ville Talvala
Stanford University
On 11/23/2010 11:30 AM, Daniel Klaffenbach wrote:
H
On 9/27/2010 8:59 PM, Alistair Buxton wrote:
On 28 September 2010 00:41, Eino-Ville Talvala wrote:
Hi,
I have a question about how extras packages not in the user/* hierarchy
interact with the application manager and updating.
As part of the FCam API, we have a package, fcam-drivers
Hi,
I have a question about how extras packages not in the user/* hierarchy
interact with the application manager and updating.
As part of the FCam API, we have a package, fcam-drivers, which replaces the
built-in camera driver modules with slightly modified ones. Previously, I've
been listi
Hi,
Since nobody seems to have good ideas on this, is there somewhere else I
could ask about this?
Thanks,
Eddy Talvala
Computer Graphics Lab
Stanford University
On 8/2/2010 11:38 AM, Eino-Ville Talvala wrote:
> Hi,
>
> I'm one of the developers on the FCam project [1], and was
Gerard,
As part of the FCam project web pages (it's a camera control API for the
N900, though that doesn't matter for your question), we wrote up an
lengthy 'getting started with N900 development' guide, aimed at people
using the Nokia Qt SDK with no previous experience. The first part gets
Hi,
I'm one of the developers on the FCam project [1], and was hoping to get
some advice on properly dealing with kernel-level dependencies in extras.
All FCam applications depend on fcam-drivers, a set of camera subsystem
kernel modules which are slightly modified from the stock kernel.
(primari
On 7/30/2010 1:47 AM, Eero Tamminen wrote:
Hi,
ext Martin Storsjö wrote:
On Sat, 24 Jul 2010, Yves-Alexis Perez wrote:
On ven., 2010-07-23 at 19:20 +0300, Martin Storsjö wrote:
Any hints on how to solve this in the best way? I don't want my app
to fail in the next QA round with the reason "c
