Levi, surely you misread my statement.
Ah, it appears that I did. My apologies. (And don't call me Shirley! :-P )
--
Just stop and take your secret journey, you will be a new box. --Leeta
http://www.gnu.org/philosophy/shouldbefree.html
___
maemo-dev
Levi, surely you misread my statement.
Sean
On Jan 26, 2007, at 10:25 AM, Levi Bard wrote:
May I say that I expected rather more antagonism than I've gotten
even with my obnoxious follow-up. The professionalism of this list
is impressive.
Wow, disagreement is unprofessional?
When you post a
May I say that I expected rather more antagonism than I've gotten
even with my obnoxious follow-up. The professionalism of this list
is impressive.
Wow, disagreement is unprofessional?
When you post an article like that to a list like this and ask for
feedback, some of it is going to be negativ
Kalle wrote:
2007/1/25, Sean Luke <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>:
- It's true that different (Newton vs. GTK+) doesn't mean
better.
But IMHO it doesn't require rabid fanboyism to make a cogent argument
that GTK+ is distinctly inferior to OS X
Yes, obviously a widget toolkit has no chance again
On 1/24/07, Sean Luke <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
...
it doesn't require rabid fanboyism to make a cogent argument
that GTK+ is distinctly inferior to OS X and maemo is inferior to
NewtonOS from an interface point of view.
Without expressing an opinion either way, I think it is important to
poin
2007/1/25, Sean Luke <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>:
- It's true that different (Newton vs. GTK+) doesn't mean better.
But IMHO it doesn't require rabid fanboyism to make a cogent argument
that GTK+ is distinctly inferior to OS X
Yes, obviously a widget toolkit has no chance against an operating
s
You may have noticed that I've made changes to the essay over the
last several days, largely in response to people's comments on the
list. At this stage I'd have asked for suggestions about where to
post it, but it's gotten leaked to InternetTabletTalk and the Nokia
blogs. Still: any sugg
