On Thu, 2005-06-16 at 08:49 +1000, Colin Charles wrote:
> even when:
> cat /proc/sys/kernel/exec-shield
> 0
>
So the real solution to those running FC-4 is to make sure you do:
echo 0 > /proc/sys/kernel/vdso
exec-shield can remain at 1, that's fine, its just vdso that needs to be
turne
On Thu, 2005-06-16 at 08:49 +1000, Colin Charles wrote:
> On Thu, 2005-06-09 at 07:24 -0700, Colin Charles wrote:
> > On Thu, 2005-06-09 at 09:14 +0200, Niels wrote:
> > > Are you using the (not yet releast due to problems, but expected
> > > 13.june) FC4, or are you using a test 3 FC4 ?
> >
> > T
On Thu, 2005-06-09 at 07:24 -0700, Colin Charles wrote:
> On Thu, 2005-06-09 at 09:14 +0200, Niels wrote:
> > Are you using the (not yet releast due to problems, but expected
> > 13.june) FC4, or are you using a test 3 FC4 ?
>
> The only real problem was the lack of naming ;-)
>
> I am using the
On Thu, 2005-06-09 at 09:14 +0200, Niels wrote:
> Are you using the (not yet releast due to problems, but expected
> 13.june) FC4, or are you using a test 3 FC4 ?
The only real problem was the lack of naming ;-)
I am using the not-yet-publically-released FC-4 (admitedly, that'd be
kernel revision
Colin Charles wrote:
On Wed, 2005-06-08 at 17:48 +0300, Timo Savola wrote:
./run_me_first.sh
Inconsistency detected by ld.so: rtld.c: 1192: dl_main: Assertion
`(void
*) ph->p_vaddr == _rtld_local._dl_sysinfo_dso' failed!
Anyone else seen this?
Take a look at these mai
On Wed, 2005-06-08 at 17:48 +0300, Timo Savola wrote:
> > ./run_me_first.sh
> > Inconsistency detected by ld.so: rtld.c: 1192: dl_main: Assertion
> `(void
> > *) ph->p_vaddr == _rtld_local._dl_sysinfo_dso' failed!
> >
> > Anyone else seen this?
>
> Take a look at these mails:
> http://lists.scr
On Tue, 2005-06-07 at 16:24 -0700, Colin Charles wrote:
> ./run_me_first.sh
> Inconsistency detected by ld.so: rtld.c: 1192: dl_main: Assertion `(void
> *) ph->p_vaddr == _rtld_local._dl_sysinfo_dso' failed!
>
> Anyone else seen this?
Take a look at these mails:
http://lists.scratchbox.org/pip
So, anyone go around and install the scratchbox rpms?
I got this:
2:scratchbox-core###
[100%]
Inconsistency detected by ld.so: rtld.c: 1192: dl_main: Assertion `(void
*) ph->p_vaddr == _rtld_local._dl_sysinfo_dso' failed!
error: %post(scratchbox-co
