Re: Any problem with chinhook beta repo?

2007-11-15 Thread Luca Donaggio
> > Yes your instructions have the correct qemu version, but Luca's post > revealed that he was using the 0.8.1 version. > > I hope the final SDK released fixed any problems Luca had. > > Cheers, > Juha > > -- > Juha Kallioinen JID: [EMAIL > PROTECTE

Re: Any problem with chinhook beta repo?

2007-11-15 Thread Juha Kallioinen
ext Santtu Lakkala wrote: > Please do note that I use the "old" debian devkit on purpose, because > the goal in my blog post is to be able to compile the same source for > different targets, so there cannot anyway be anything using the new > features of the newer devkit. I have to admit that I did

Re: Any problem with chinhook beta repo?

2007-11-14 Thread Eero Tamminen
Hi, ext Luca Donaggio wrote: > On Nov 8, 2007 4:04 PM, Gabriel Schulhof <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: >> On Thu, 2007-11-08 at 15:14 +0100, ext Luca Donaggio wrote: >>> It seems that my sbox target is somewhat misconfigured: it should look >>> in binary-armel subdir on repository.maemo.org, not binar

Re: Any problem with chinhook beta repo?

2007-11-09 Thread Santtu Lakkala
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE- Hash: SHA1 Juha Kallioinen wrote: > ext Luca Donaggio wrote: >> Any clue about how to fix it? I followed these instructions to set up >> my sbox environment: >> >> http://inz.fi/blog/2007/10/22/multi-target-development-for-maemo/ >> >> My current parameters for c

Re: Any problem with chinhook beta repo?

2007-11-08 Thread Juha Kallioinen
ext Luca Donaggio wrote: > On Nov 8, 2007 4:04 PM, Gabriel Schulhof <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: >> On Thu, 2007-11-08 at 15:14 +0100, ext Luca Donaggio wrote: >>> It seems that my sbox target is somewhat misconfigured: it should look >>> in binary-armel subdir on repository.maemo.org, not binary-arm

Re: Any problem with chinhook beta repo?

2007-11-08 Thread Luca Donaggio
On Nov 8, 2007 4:04 PM, Gabriel Schulhof <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > On Thu, 2007-11-08 at 15:14 +0100, ext Luca Donaggio wrote: > > It seems that my sbox target is somewhat misconfigured: it should look > > in binary-armel subdir on repository.maemo.org, not binary-arm, but I > > don't have any c

Re: Any problem with chinhook beta repo?

2007-11-08 Thread Gabriel Schulhof
On Thu, 2007-11-08 at 15:14 +0100, ext Luca Donaggio wrote: > It seems that my sbox target is somewhat misconfigured: it should look > in binary-armel subdir on repository.maemo.org, not binary-arm, but I > don't have any clue why it happened and how to correct it! IIRC, there is a certain combinat

Re: Any problem with chinhook beta repo?

2007-11-08 Thread Luca Donaggio
I answered myself :-) ! It seems that my sbox target is somewhat misconfigured: it should look in binary-armel subdir on repository.maemo.org, not binary-arm, but I don't have any clue why it happened and how to correct it! Luca Donaggio On Nov 8, 2007 2:59 PM, Luca Donaggio <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> w

Any problem with chinhook beta repo?

2007-11-08 Thread Luca Donaggio
I keep on getting these errors when trying to do an apt-get update before installing the maemo-sdk-dev metapackage for armel target (under i386 target the same worked smoothly): [sbox-chinook-armel: ~] > apt-get update Err http://repository.maemo.org chinook/free Packages 404 Not Found [IP: 79.1