Re: Maemo contribution guidelines - v1.0 candidate draft

2009-01-09 Thread Kees Jongenburger
On Tue, Dec 30, 2008 at 3:40 PM, wrote: > http://wiki.maemo.org/Maemo_contribution_guidelines > > This has gone through several rounds of feedback and it will be > considered official as is unless sensible major changes are proposed. > > Feedback and precision are always welcome. Simply Excellen

Re: Maemo contribution guidelines - v1.0 candidate draft

2008-12-31 Thread BenoƮt HERVIER
Great jobs. Thanks 2008/12/30 : > http://wiki.maemo.org/Maemo_contribution_guidelines > > This has gone through several rounds of feedback and it will be > considered official as is unless sensible major changes are proposed. > > Feedback and precision are always welcome. > > -- > Quim Gil > mar

Maemo contribution guidelines - v1.0 candidate draft

2008-12-30 Thread quim.gil
http://wiki.maemo.org/Maemo_contribution_guidelines This has gone through several rounds of feedback and it will be considered official as is unless sensible major changes are proposed. Feedback and precision are always welcome. -- Quim Gil marketing manager, open source maemo software @ Nokia _

Re: Contribution guidelines

2008-11-24 Thread Quim Gil
These were good comments, thanks! Marius Vollmer wrote: >Obviously, the license of the contributed code must be compatible >with the project that you contribute to. It is a good idea to use >the same license as the project that you contribute to. http://wiki.maemo.org/Maemo_contribut

Re: Contribution guidelines

2008-11-21 Thread Marius Vollmer
"ext Quim Gil" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes: > http://wiki.maemo.org/Maemo_contribution_guidelines > > License > > The license of the code contributed is the one of the component patched. I would relax this: Obviously, the license of the contributed code must be compatible with the project t

Re: Contribution guidelines

2008-11-21 Thread Quim Gil
Hi, http://wiki.maemo.org/Maemo_contribution_guidelines updated with your comments and looks already quite good. New sections created: Submissions and Quality. "Copyright assignment" wording changed. ext Dave Neary wrote: > It bears the question, though - why are these even needed? What is the >

Re: Contribution guidelines

2008-11-20 Thread Andrea Grandi
Hi, > I've seen some patches of lower quality added to Maemo Bugzilla, so I > would add that > * Patches should not generate any more compile time warnings than >were already there. > * Patches should not include any commented code lines from tests. > * Patches should not ad

Re: Contribution guidelines

2008-11-20 Thread Andre Klapper
Am Donnerstag, den 20.11.2008, 15:01 +0200 schrieb Quim Gil: > Developers, please have a look at > > http://wiki.maemo.org/Maemo_contribution_guidelines > > The idea is to have these guidelines agreed with you and approved by > Nokia. As you see they are quite simple, and it would be good to have

Re: Contribution guidelines

2008-11-20 Thread Dave Neary
Hi Quim, They look good to me - simple, clear, reasonable. It bears the question, though - why are these even needed? What is the problem that they solve? I'm not playing Devil's advocate here - I am just wondering what the reasoning is. Cheers, Dave. Quim Gil wrote: > Developers, please have

Contribution guidelines

2008-11-20 Thread Quim Gil
Developers, please have a look at http://wiki.maemo.org/Maemo_contribution_guidelines The idea is to have these guidelines agreed with you and approved by Nokia. As you see they are quite simple, and it would be good to have them ready by the end of the year (latest) so they can be applied to the