On Thu, Nov 12, 2009 at 03:06, Jeremiah Foster
jerem...@jeremiahfoster.com wrote:
This email is a set of action points that were brought up during
the QA meeting on IRC which Valerio suggested. I felt the meeting was
quite productive, we have some more things to discuss and we have some
Jeremiah Foster wrote:
Developers should not be able to promote their own applications, it
is assumed that they believe the app is production ready by
submitting it to testing. Perhaps if there were a different button
for developers, i.e. 'Demote this package', then the app can be
removed
On Nov 12, 2009, at 3:17 AM, Dave Neary wrote:
So - how can we make giving the feedback and voting on applications
easier?
Oh, this one's easy. Get some servers so rating a package isn't either
impossible or a 20-minute endeavor. Even motivated testers like myself
don't have much
Hi,
Edward Page wrote:
To help remind people that there is a checklist and whats on it,
should the rating page link to or include the criteria?
I see there were no notes on the algorithm. A threshold of 10 was
annoying as a developer. As a tester, a threshold of 10 made me feel
more
On Nov 12, 2009, at 6:15, Quim Gil wrote:
Hi,
ext Edward Page wrote:
Which reminds me, any reason Maemo doesn't use Debian's popularity contest?
At least at a community level there is
https://garage.maemo.org/projects/popcon/
Bas (the founder of that project) and I have been discussing
On Nov 12, 2009, at 9:17, Dave Neary wrote:
Hi,
Edward Page wrote:
To help remind people that there is a checklist and whats on it,
should the rating page link to or include the criteria?
Yes - that makes sense.
I see there were no notes on the algorithm. A threshold of 10 was
Hello!
This email is a set of action points that were brought up during the QA
meeting on IRC which Valerio suggested. I felt the meeting was quite
productive, we have some more things to discuss and we have some 'actionable
items' as it were.
To begin, there is a general
The results of the meeting all sound good.
As part of the UX work, should we include the application ratings as
part of the testing interface? We just had someone step through
random areas of an app, it seems we should leverage this and remind
them to rate it.
Which reminds me, any reason Maemo
Hi,
ext Edward Page wrote:
Which reminds me, any reason Maemo doesn't use Debian's popularity contest?
At least at a community level there is
https://garage.maemo.org/projects/popcon/
--
Quim Gil
open source advocate
Maemo Devices @ Nokia
___
Hello!
That all sounds OK.
One other point that just came into my mind. Is it possible (I havn't
yet promoted something) to leave some message to the testers while
promoting application to extras-testing (or even leave permantent
comments regarding testing as part of the application
10 matches
Mail list logo
