Hi,
ext Graham Cobb wrote:
> As Nokia host it, they will probably want to say something like packages will
> be removed if there appear to be serious patent concerns.
Nokia currently defines what you just said through the
http://maemo.org/legal/terms_of_use.html , that affect also the extras &
e
Graham Cobb schrieb:
>> Quality:
>> - The package must not brick the device.
>> - The package needs to install and uninstall cleanly.
>> - The package must not break other packages.
>> - The package can only depend on libraries that are present in the
>> default firmware image or librar
> If people want to know what the community thinks of a particular application
> we would do better to make available stats on number of downloads (gives you
> an idea on the number of people using it -- 3 downloads should set off
> warning flags!) and have a feedback rating scheme.
A small nit -
On Monday 04 February 2008 15:27:48 Niels Breet wrote:
> In general I think we need to have some rules in place to ensure that
> only quality software ends up in extras. Promoting from extras-devel
> would even be better. (More on that in a separate mail)
Excellent topic for discussion. Actually
On Sun, February 3, 2008 11:58, Pavel Rojtberg wrote:
> Hi
>
>
> I am searching for some guidelines which packages I may upload to the
> maemo extras repository.
In general I think we need to have some rules in place to ensure that
only quality software ends up in extras. Promoting from extras-dev
Hi
I am searching for some guidelines which packages I may upload to the
maemo extras repository.
What about the alpha of my music player?
What about non-free software?
What about patent encumbered software?
Greets,
Pavel Rojtberg
___
maemo-developers
