Eero Tamminen wrote:
> I was recently notified that in extras repository some package for
> which I've been marked as maintainer, was causing an SSU (testing)
> issue.
Any chance said package is liblzo2-2 ?
If so, I am the uploader as noted here:
https://bugs.maemo.org/show_bug.cgi?id=6286#c2
On Fri, Jan 22, 2010 at 1:21 PM, Nathan Anderson
wrote:
> Jeremiah,
>
> Thanks -- I have no issues with dropping my name into the maintainer
> field; I just didn't want to steal any credit from the "real" authors of
> those things that I just repackaged. I do know the language of everythi
On Fri, Jan 22, 2010 at 1:08 PM, Eero Tamminen wrote:
> There must be somebody who is responsible for the uploaded package and
> some way to contact him. The uploader must have somehow verified that
> the package isn't e.g. malicious (even if it's just taken from a trusted
> source).
>
> If it's
On Fri, Jan 22, 2010 at 12:40 PM, Jeremiah Foster
wrote:
> The changelog is a must, but changing the maintainer name in the
> debian/control file is also a must, according to maemo packaging policy. Here
> is the policy in pdf: WARNING PDF! >>
> https://maemo.org/forrest-images/pdf/maemo-polic
> Thanks -- I have no issues with dropping my name into
> the maintainer field; I just didn't want to steal any credit
> from the "real" authors of
> those things that I just repackaged. I do know the language
> of everything
> I've repackages; and could probably muddle my way through
velopers-boun...@maemo.org] On Behalf Of Jeremiah Foster
Sent: Friday, January 22, 2010 10:40 AM
To: maemo-developers@maemo.org
Subject: Re: Maemo extras repository package uploader/maintainer
verification?
On Jan 22, 2010, at 5:17 PM, Nathan Anderson wrote:
> Ok, I think I must be confused; I
Hi,
ext Marcin Juszkiewicz wrote:
Dnia piątek, 22 stycznia 2010 o 14:03:18 Andrew Flegg napisał(a):
On Fri, Jan 22, 2010 at 12:59, Simon Pickering
wrote:
I'd suggest that the autobuilder checks to see that the uploader's email
address is included in one of the *Maintainer fields; but there i
2010 7:00 AM
> To: 'Jeremiah Foster'; maemo-developers@maemo.org
> Subject: RE: Maemo extras repository package uploader/maintainer
> verification?
>
>
>
>>> What checks there are in place to verify that the package uploader
>>> and the package maintainer f
ginal Message-
From: maemo-developers-boun...@maemo.org
[mailto:maemo-developers-boun...@maemo.org] On Behalf Of Simon Pickering
Sent: Friday, January 22, 2010 7:00 AM
To: 'Jeremiah Foster'; maemo-developers@maemo.org
Subject: RE: Maemo extras repository package uploader/maintainer
verifi
On Jan 22, 2010, at 2:19 PM, Ed Bartosh wrote:
> 2010/1/22 Andrew Flegg :
>> On Fri, Jan 22, 2010 at 12:59, Simon Pickering
>> wrote:
>>>
>>> I'd suggest that the autobuilder checks to see that the uploader's email
>>> address is included in one of the *Maintainer fields; but there is the
>>>
Dnia piątek, 22 stycznia 2010 o 14:03:18 Andrew Flegg napisał(a):
> On Fri, Jan 22, 2010 at 12:59, Simon Pickering
wrote:
> > I'd suggest that the autobuilder checks to see that the uploader's email
> > address is included in one of the *Maintainer fields; but there is the
> > slight problem of w
> >> I'd suggest that the autobuilder checks to see that the
> >> uploader's email
> >> address is included in one of the *Maintainer fields; but
> >> there is the
> >> slight problem of what happens when someone is uploading
> >> someone else's
> >> package (e.g. as a favour when they are aw
2010/1/22 Andrew Flegg :
> On Fri, Jan 22, 2010 at 12:59, Simon Pickering
> wrote:
>>
>> I'd suggest that the autobuilder checks to see that the uploader's email
>> address is included in one of the *Maintainer fields; but there is the
>> slight problem of what happens when someone is uploading s
On Fri, Jan 22, 2010 at 12:59, Simon Pickering wrote:
>
> I'd suggest that the autobuilder checks to see that the uploader's email
> address is included in one of the *Maintainer fields; but there is the
> slight problem of what happens when someone is uploading someone else's
> package (e.g. as a
> > What checks there are in place to verify that the package
> > uploader and
> > the package maintainer field (shown to people who install
> > the packages)
> > match?
>
> I think Niels has a check for that in the QA software he has
> written, in fact, I am certain of it. :) This check doe
Hi,
ext Jeremiah Foster wrote:
On Jan 22, 2010, at 11:49 AM, Eero Tamminen wrote:
I was recently notified that in extras repository some package for
which I've been marked as maintainer, was causing an SSU (testing)
issue.
However, I hadn't uploaded that package.
The package was from SDK tool
On Jan 22, 2010, at 11:49 AM, Eero Tamminen wrote:
> Hi,
>
> I was recently notified that in extras repository some package for
> which I've been marked as maintainer, was causing an SSU (testing)
> issue.
>
> However, I hadn't uploaded that package.
>
> The package was from SDK tools reposito
Hi,
I was recently notified that in extras repository some package for
which I've been marked as maintainer, was causing an SSU (testing)
issue.
However, I hadn't uploaded that package.
The package was from SDK tools repository were I was the correct contact
person for that package. The packag
18 matches
Mail list logo
