OK, but why is it blocked to promote packages depending on qtquickcompat?
Qt 4.7 namespace is deprecated!
--
Marcin
2012/9/27 Ивайло Димитров
>
> qtquickcompat in CSSU is just a dummy package as CSSU comes with Qt 4.7.4
>
> https://gitorious.org/community-ssu/qtquickcompat
>
>
>
> > О
qtquickcompat in CSSU is just a dummy package as CSSU comes with Qt 4.7.4
https://gitorious.org/community-ssu/qtquickcompat
> Оригинално писмо
>От: Marcin Mielniczuk
>Относно: Promotion of packages depending on qtquickcompat is blocked
>До: maemo-developers@maemo.org
>
Hi,
There has been support for and no objections to the below proposal.
How do we go about implementing this?
Thanks,
Neal
At Tue, 13 Dec 2011 14:00:54 +0100,
Neal H. Walfield wrote:
>
> Thanks to everyone for the feedback. I'm happy to learn that there is
> already infrastructure for differe
At Wed, 14 Dec 2011 13:32:47 +0100,
Nicolai Hess wrote:
> Yes, but who decides to transfer the maintainance? Can this only be done by
> the current
> maintainer?
> I doubt most maintainers of orphaned packages are listening to this
> request.
As I understand it, the maintainer gets an email. If t
2011/12/14 Neal H. Walfield
> Hi Nicolai,
>
> > Is it possible to transfer the maintainance for orphaned packages to
> other,
> > still active, developers?
> > If so, I would volunteer myself for maintainance of some orphaned
> packages.
>
> If you look at the package's page (e.g.,
> http://maemo
Hi Nicolai,
> Is it possible to transfer the maintainance for orphaned packages to other,
> still active, developers?
> If so, I would volunteer myself for maintainance of some orphaned packages.
If you look at the package's page (e.g.,
http://maemo.org/packages/view/feedingit/), there is a "Requ
2011/12/14 Attila Csipa
> On 14-Dec-11 03:00, Roberto Colistete Jr. wrote:
>
>> This have been talked about, but stopped at a question - do you really
>>> want orphaned packages published in Extras ? If a problem surfaces or a
>>> bug gets reported, there is nobody to take care of it, and removal
On 14-Dec-11 03:00, Roberto Colistete Jr. wrote:
This have been talked about, but stopped at a question - do you really
want orphaned packages published in Extras ? If a problem surfaces or a
bug gets reported, there is nobody to take care of it, and removal can
get really tricky (who gets final
On 12/12/2011 08:19 PM, emme750 at gmail.com wrote:
You should also solve the problem of those applications that are ready to be promoted,
but the maintainer is no longer "alive".
For example, after one month of the release, the promotion may become
automatic, or we should enable Supertester to
Em 13-12-2011 11:00, Neal H. Walfield escreveu:
Thanks to everyone for the feedback. I'm happy to learn that there is
already infrastructure for differentiating super-testers from normal
tesers. I think promoting orphaned packages is a different discussion
and I think this should be decided sep
Thanks to everyone for the feedback. I'm happy to learn that there is
already infrastructure for differentiating super-testers from normal
tesers. I think promoting orphaned packages is a different discussion
and I think this should be decided seperately.
My new proposal is:
- quarantine for 1
On 12 December 2011 17:44, robert bauer wrote:
>
> FWIW, the council (of which I am a member) suggested the idea of a limited
> number of "supertesters" to Nemein awhile ago. The approval of a single
> supertester would, in the absence of any disapproval, be sufficient for
> promotion. IMHO, the
Hi Neal,
Thank you for taking the time to post this and to make a proposal. In my
opinion, the testing of packages is an essential function of the community
and we should come up with a solution that accounts for the lesser volume
of active participants in maemo these days.
FWIW, the council (of
Hi,
I propose that since most devs are asking others to vote for them
we remove the whole testing requirement and make promoting to extras-testing
something that's at the will of the developer.
--
Sent from my Nokia N950
Regards,
Mohammad Abu-Garbeyyeh
On 12/12/11 05:47 PM Neal H. Walfield wro
Not sure if someone worked on this, but it is fine now.
Thanks!
anidel
On Fri, Jun 10, 2011 at 14:25, Aniello Del Sorbo wrote:
> Hi,
>
> few minutes ago I promoted (or better, tried to promote) Xournal to
> extras-testing for approval to Extras.
>
> After logging in and clicking on the Promote
Thanks a lot, Niels!
I can confirm that it's working fine, now. Allowing long lines was a
good choice IMHO, as it seems that quite a few packages have their
icons displayed now, which didn't show one before.
Martin
2010/4/7, George Kibardin :
>
> It works now! Thank you!
>
> 07.04.10, 15:07, "
It works now! Thank you!
07.04.10, 15:07, "Niels Breet" :
> On Sun, April 4, 2010 20:42, George Kibardin wrote:
> > Hi everybody,
> >
> >
> > It seems that I missed something. Suddenly I cannot promote the latest
> > version of my app from diablo extras-devel to diablo extras. I've read
>
On Sun, April 4, 2010 20:42, George Kibardin wrote:
> Hi everybody,
>
>
> It seems that I missed something. Suddenly I cannot promote the latest
> version of my app from diablo extras-devel to diablo extras. I've read
> this http://wiki.maemo.org/Uploading_to_Extras, tried this
> https://garage.mae
On Wed, April 7, 2010 10:06, Martin Grimme wrote:
> Hi,
Hi,
>
> same here, so it might be a general problem with the Diablo promoter.
> Besides taking 9 days for the package interface to recognize that a
> package has been updated, and then complaining that the package didn't have
> a proper descri
Hi,
same here, so it might be a general problem with the Diablo promoter.
Besides taking 9 days for the package interface to recognize that a
package has been updated, and then complaining that the package didn't
have a proper description (which it certainly has). The package icon
is not imported,
Am Dienstag, den 12.01.2010, 10:43 +0100 schrieb tero.k...@nokia.com:
> It seems that the package entered testing 2010-01-03 20:26 UTC
> That is from the package event field on the page.
>
> So you have about one day and ten hours of waiting left :-)
>
Thanks a lot
would be nice
It seems that the package entered testing 2010-01-03 20:26 UTC
That is from the package event field on the page.
So you have about one day and ten hours of waiting left :-)
Tero
> -Original Message-
> From: maemo-developers-boun...@maemo.org [mailto:maemo-developers-
> boun...@maemo.org]
Am Montag, den 11.01.2010, 23:02 +0200 schrieb Ed Bartosh:
> 2010/1/11 Valerio Valerio :
> > Hi,
> >
> > On Mon, Jan 11, 2010 at 8:17 PM, ds wrote:
> >>
> >> Hello,
> >>
> >> some weeks ago I promoted to extras. I could not find any changes.
> >>
> >> I have Karma 11 in extras testing: Why is the
2010/1/11 Valerio Valerio :
> Hi,
>
> On Mon, Jan 11, 2010 at 8:17 PM, ds wrote:
>>
>> Hello,
>>
>> some weeks ago I promoted to extras. I could not find any changes.
>>
>> I have Karma 11 in extras testing: Why is there not promotion link now?
>
> The packages have to pass 10 days of quarantine[1
Hi,
On Mon, Jan 11, 2010 at 8:17 PM, ds wrote:
> Hello,
>
> some weeks ago I promoted to extras. I could not find any changes.
>
> I have Karma 11 in extras testing: Why is there not promotion link now?
>
The packages have to pass 10 days of quarantine[1] in testing before the
promotion link ap
> Hi Niels,
>
>
> On Wed, Oct 21, 2009 at 8:21 AM, Niels Breet wrote:
>
>> Hi,
>>
>>
>> While implementing a new notification feature for the community QA
>> queue, a number of mails have been sent out to owners of packages in
>> extras-testing.
>
> I received a couple of these e-mails (although a
Hi Niels,
On Wed, Oct 21, 2009 at 8:21 AM, Niels Breet wrote:
> Hi,
>
> While implementing a new notification feature for the community QA queue,
> a number of mails have been sent out to owners of packages in
> extras-testing.
I received a couple of these e-mails (although all of them are
packa
27 matches
Mail list logo
