Re: optify liqbase

2009-11-02 Thread Henrik Hedberg
Gary Birkett wrote: > this should with 1 symlink or hardlink and will cure all liqbase /opt > situations: > > /usr/share/liqbase/* Why do you need that symlink at all? If you put all your application data into /opt/liqbase (and subdirectories) and you have the control, then all paths can

Re: optify liqbase

2009-11-02 Thread Marius Vollmer
ext Gary Birkett writes: > /usr/share/liqbase/* > /usr/share/liqbase/libliqbase/* > /usr/share/liqbase/liqflow/* > /usr/share/liqbase/liqtorch/* > /usr/share/liqbase/liqcalendar/* > /usr/share/liqbase/*/* > > [...] > > should I just go with the normal splash 100s of optify symlinks? I would expe

Re: optify liqbase

2009-11-02 Thread Andrew Flegg
On Mon, Nov 2, 2009 at 15:42, Gary Birkett wrote: > > i am considering how to optify liqbase and its components. > the issue I have is I don't want all the apps to need to change and do > not want 100s of symlinks and added complexity when only 1 is needed. > [snip] > &g

optify liqbase

2009-11-02 Thread Gary Birkett
hey, i am considering how to optify liqbase and its components. the issue I have is I don't want all the apps to need to change and do not want 100s of symlinks and added complexity when only 1 is needed. assuming the following packages: libliqbase liqflow liqtorch liqcalendar onedotzero li